Skip to content
Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$29kHealth$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$12kHuman Services$12kAnimals$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$5,000
VENTURE OUT PROJECT$5,000
URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE$5,000
PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 18%GALLOP NYC: $3k → 13%ONE SIGHT: $5k → 6%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $2k → 7%SIXTH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 3 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
34

Total granted

$26k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +21%
  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +32%
  • SF
    SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $4k · revenue +325%

Funded once

  • 4O
    4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • PAROLE PREPARATION PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +95%
  • SS
    SIXTH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
11
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges to Prosperity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $9,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES …INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $4,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MIS…BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $2,500 · InternationalBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INCPEACEWORKS INC: $2,000 · InternationalPEACEWORKS INC4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $7,500 · Other4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INCONEHOPECHILDREN INC: $5,000 · OtherONEHOPECHILDREN INCAVP: $4,000 · OtherAVPUNBRIDLED HEROES PROJECT: $4,000 · OtherUNBRIDLED HEROES PROJECTNURSES FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $4,000 · OtherNURSES FOR SOCIAL JUSTICESEATTLE KING COUNTY DISASTER TEAM: $3,000 · OtherWE MAKE NOISE INC: $2,500 · OtherWildlife Conservation Society: $3,000 · OtherREAL DOG RESCUE INC: $2,500 · OtherTHE VENTURE OUT PROJECT INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE VENTURE OUT PROJECT INCMADELINE CORPORATION: $2,500 · OtherALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $2,500 · OtherSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · OtherSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INCWOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH: $3,000 · OtherBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $2,500 · OtherMOVE UNITED: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,500 · OtherSIXTH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSIXTH STREET COMMUN…URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Human ServicesURBAN RESOURCE INST…OneSight: $5,000 · Human ServicesOneSightNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INDIGENOUS…GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesGIVING ALTERNATIVE …SHELTERBOX USA INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INCPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPONY POWER THERAPIE…MUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureThe Lake George Association Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureLATSKY DANCE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsPAROLE PREPARATION PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Crime & Legal
International$34,000Other$58,500Human Services$26,000Arts & Culture$10,500Health$10,000Civil Rights$8,500Crime & Legal$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAROLE PREPARATION PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSIXTH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VENTURE OUT PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOneSight: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lake George Association Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAL DOG RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADELINE CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEWORKS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMOVE UNITED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…The New York Communit…The Ford FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…ImpactassetsincJewish Communal FundVerizon FoundationNational Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Jewish Communal Fund · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Move United: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joanne & Al Daloisio Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joanne & Al Daloisio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home