How much did JKS FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of JKS FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k9 grants · $41k
$10k–50k2 grants · $35k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST VINCENT-ST MARY HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT COUNTY$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$5,000
KOVLER DIABETES CENTER$5,000
STELLA MARIS CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
RSHM LIFE CENTER$5,000
SHARING CONNECTIONS FURNITURE BANK$5,000
ARCHBISHOP HOBAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
SWAG$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANGELMAN SYNDROME THERAPEUTICS$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$755k · 18 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$755k

$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%

-19%

Still filing today

39%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SV
ST VINCENT-ST MARY HIGH SCHOOL
9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +1008%
UW
UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT COUNTY
9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +22%
TC
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +53%

Funded once

FO
FRIENDS OF RWANDAN EDUCATION
one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -22%
SM
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
one grant, 2017 · $5k
FY
FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN
one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Second Street Youth Center Inc

Mission of the second street youth center (ssyc) is to develop children's competency, self-esteem, & self- reliance through opportunities.

Human Services

Young Men's & Young Women's Hebrew

The riverdale "y" is a multi-generational agency providing informal education, leisure-time activities, and social services to meet the recreational, social, and cultural needs of the jewish and general communities.

—

Saint Mary's Nursery School

Provide early education and care to young children (primarily between 18 months and 5 years of age). provide after school for elementary age children (kindergarten through third grade). provide care to children so that their parents and…

Education

The Vincent Smith School

The Vincent Smith School is a co-ed, independent, special education school for grades ones through twelve, serving Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City students. The School specializes in students with various learning issues.

Education

Friends School Inc

Friends' school is a supportive, dynamic community committed to educating the whole child head, hand, and heart and to training exceptional teachers for tomorrow's classrooms. we provide a strong academic foundation while developing…

Education

All Saints Elementary of Tipperary Hill

All saints elementary operrates an universal kindergarten from age 3 to 4 and a faith based elementary school from kindergarten to grade 6, with an after school care program, emphasizing character, morals and acedemic learning.

Education

Saint Marys School

Saint Marys School in Raleigh North Carolina is an independent college-preparatory girls boarding and day school dedicated to academic excellence and personal achievement for grades 9 - 12.

Education

The Youth and Family Center

Helping families and older adults by providing social, educational, and recreational resources.

—

Manhattan Youth Recreation and Resources

Manhattan youth's mission is to provide the highest quality academic, recreation and cultural activities to individuals and families who live and work in lower manhattan, regardless of their income.

Youth Development

The Santa Ynez Valley Family School

The family school is dedicated to providing a superior environment of child centered academic and creative programs which inspire a joy of learning and support critical thinking. we strive to prepare students to be compassionate,…

Education

The School in Rose Valley

The School in Rose Valley is a progressive school for children in preschool through sixth grade. In our classrooms and our wooded campus, teachers and students create experiences that arouse curiosity, stretch muscles, strengthen…

Education

St Mary's Early Learning Academy

At st. mary's our mission is to provide safe, quality childcare that is available to everyone regardless of socioeconomic class, race, sex, or religion.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Summit and Medina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/12

Grantees still filing

8/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$319,500Education$250,000Human Services$105,000Philanthropy$90,000Housing & Shelter$10,000International$10,000Health$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JKS FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ST VINCENT-ST MARY HIGH SCHOOL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 020694782 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ST VINCENT-ST MARY HIGH SCHOOL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jks Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jks Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JKS FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jks Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JKS FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jks Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph