· Public charity
Jewelers for Children
The organization was formed by the manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers in the jewelry industry to raise funds from an annual dinner dance for the benefit of other charitable organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $410k
- $250k+3 grants · $930k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION | $350,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $330,000 |
| ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH | $250,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $150,000 |
| NO KID HUNGRY | $65,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA | $65,000 |
| TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION | $65,000 |
| REACH OUT AND READ INC | $65,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $12,500 |
| BABY 2 BABY | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $535k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $170k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $85k to organizations and $85k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CHARITABLE DONATION
Stated purpose: CONTRIBUTION
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $285k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +38%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +145%
ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH7× · 2018–2025 · $595k · revenue +35%
Funded once
Save The Children Federation Incone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +21%- TCThe Chris Lantos Foundationone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +5%
- WNWASHINGTON NATIONALS YOUTH BASEBALL ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Children's services
Promoting and supporting the development of national and community level systems that help children realize their full potential within a nurturing, protective family care environment.
The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.
To grant wishes to and otherwise act for the benefit of children suffering from terminal or life theatening illness or disease.
Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Kidspeace, founded in 1882, is a healthcare nonprofit that is dedicated to providing hope, help, and healing to children, adults, and those who love them.continued on schedule o.with 40 offices and facilities across seven states, this…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Santa America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Santa America Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA (GROUP RETURN) ↗
- Who funds TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Chris Lantos Foundation ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONALS YOUTH BASEBALL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds KENNY ROGERS CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE ↗
- Who funds SONGS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Meeting Street ↗
- Who funds KOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Give Back Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewelers for Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.