Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jeno and Lois Paulucci Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$549kFood & Nutrition$178kEnvironment$125kHousing & Shelter$123kPublic Safety & Disaster$110kEducation$55kHuman Services$46kYouth Development$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CROSS SERVICES: $10k → 11%MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%FEED THE CHILDREN: $10k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $10k → 14%UNITED WAY OF LEE HENDRY & GLADES COUNTIES: $10k → 11%GOODWILL: $1k → 11%UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $5k → 12%SEED IMPACT (TIDES CENTER): $125k → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $13k → 12%NEW HOPE FOR KIDS: $5k → 13%GABRIEL HOUSE OF CARE: $5k → 14%TEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUND: $100k → 14%EDINA EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 11%EVERY MEAL: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $10k → 11%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $10k → 13%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY: $100k → 14%EDINA EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 11%EVERY MEAL: $8k → 14%DULUTH HERITAGE SPORTS CENTER: $10k → 15%DAVE'S HOUSE: $50k → 13%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $10k → 11%EVERY MEAL: $8k → 14%ESSENTIA DULUTH HERITAGE CENTER: $10k → 15%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $8k → 13%PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE: $8k → 11%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $8k → 13%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $8k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FL: $5k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IA
CA
MO
KY
DC
HI
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$569k · 9 repeat orgs$657k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
28

Total granted

$569k
$657k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EVERY MEAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +558%
  • NL
    Northern Lights Foundation
    2× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +496%
  • EE
    EDINA EDUCATION FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SI
    SEED IMPACT (TIDES CENTER)
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

7
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
9
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
10
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

12
Heart of Florida United Way Inc

The mission of heart of florida united way is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our communities. this is accomplished by standing up for the health, education, and financial stability of every person in central florida.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHawaiian Community Developm…Central Florida Community O…Youth & Family Support Serv…Homelessness & Housing Serv…Youth Sports Leagues
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr13%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr13%39%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
15%
4,378/29,682

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND (GINA PAULUCCI DONOR ADVISED FUND) — $378,585 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND (GINA PAULUCCI DONOR ADVISED FUND)SEED IMPACT (TIDES CENTER) — $125,000 · OtherSEED IMPACT (TIDES CENTER)TEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUND — $100,000 · OtherTEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUNDHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $33,000 · Other+18 more — $164,092 · Other+18 moreFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERI…EVERY MEAL — $45,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEALSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $7,500 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMU…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN…The United Way of Lee County Inc — $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe United W…DAVE'S HOUSE INC — $50,000 · HealthNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $5,000 · HealthTIDES CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesNorthern Lights Foundation — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION BBQ RELIEF — $5,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationEDINA EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC — $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$800,677Food & Nutrition$152,500Philanthropy$145,000Health$55,000Human Services$55,000Education$45,000Housing & Shelter$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDAVE'S HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetEVERY MEAL — $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Lights Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDINA EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDULUTH HERITAGE SPORTS CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jeno and Lois Paulucci Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Central Florida Council Boy Scouts of America Inc2% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Community of Hope1% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc1% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jeno and Lois Paulucci Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jeno and Lois Paulucci Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph