Skip to content
Jeffrey Robideau Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jeffrey Robideau Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$30kHuman Services$9kHousing & Shelter$6kRecreation & Sports$5kEducation$4kInternational$3kReligion$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$80k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$3,000
PREBORN$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
ROOTS MONTESSORI SCHOOL$1,000
FAMILY AND INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE C$1,000
RUTH ELLIS CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT REFRESH: $1k → 18%FAMILY AND INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE C: $1k → 9%PREBORN: $1k → 16%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%PROJECT REFRESH: $1k → 18%PREBORN: $1k → 16%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
IN
OH
CO
VA
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 13 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +197% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$52k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+197%
+35%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +329%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
    3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +224%
  • TS
    THE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHACK
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +202%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
4
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
10
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
11
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ANN ARBOR: $6,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ANN ARBORST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITALSHELTER ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · OtherSHELTER ASSOCIATIONPROMEDICA BIXBY & HERRICK HOSP FDN: $3,000 · OtherPROMEDICA BIXBY & HERRICK HOSP FDNTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · OtherTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDRENTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · OtherTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INCTHE SHACK: $2,000 · OtherTHE SHACKUniversity of Michigan: $1,600 · OtherUniversity of MichiganST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA: $1,000 · OtherEND OF ROAD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIE: $1,000 · Other+6 more: $2,300 · Other+6 moreHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOU…COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORKPROJECT REFRESH INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT REFRESH INCMission Pre-Born Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesMission Pre-Born IncSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesROOTS MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationColorado Christian University: $1,000 · EducationLENAWEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $440 · EducationLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,750 · PhilanthropyRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsDESTINY RESCUE USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalThe Borgen Project: $250 · InternationalPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public BenefitCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Health
Other$28,900Human Services$25,700Education$3,440Philanthropy$2,750Recreation & Sports$2,500International$2,250Public Benefit$1,000Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT REFRESH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDESTINY RESCUE USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetColorado Christian University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLENAWEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Borgen Project: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace Foundati…Raymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…
Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jeffrey Robideau Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jeffrey Robideau Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffrey Robideau’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home