Skip to content
Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$651kHealth$385kPhilanthropy$341kArts & Culture$290kRecreation & Sports$216kHuman Services$210kYouth Development$89kReligion$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN$150,000
SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION$75,000
JOHN MAILLINGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATI$17,000
ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION$15,000
HILL COUNTRY ALLIANCE$10,000
LIVE LIKE BRAUN FOUNDATION$10,000
PCRF$5,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$5,000
FORGIVEN WARRIORS OF CHRIST$5,000
CITY OF HOPE$5,000
PVGC SHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%KIDWORKS: $25k → 10%KIDWORKS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 26 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
48

Total granted

$1.4M
$817k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+20%

Still filing today

73%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $130k · revenue +74%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    4× · 2018–2024 · $127k · revenue +27%
  • SF
    SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • BC
    BEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • MI
    MyGoodness Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -100% · 95% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
2
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
8
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
39/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HELP GROUP: $143,000 · OtherTHE HELP GROUPKCRW: $114,000 · OtherKCRWKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherKCRW FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FUND: $100,000 · OtherBEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FUNDPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUND: $65,000 · OtherHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES: $50,000 · OtherREADING PARTNERS AT MUFG: $48,452 · Other+52 more: $644,726 · Other+52 moreTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDAT…UCLA FOUNDATION: $151,400 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONJOHN MALLINGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationJOHN MALLINGER CHARIT…NEW SCHOOL FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $25,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $15,080 · EducationLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION: $130,000 · PhilanthropyLAND OF THE FR…SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropySEAL FUTURE FO…ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION: $37,500 · PhilanthropyROD DEDEAUX FO…EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyEAT LEARN PLAY…THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION: $24,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOVERY …CoreGiving Co: $12,500 · Philanthropy+3 more: $12,000 · PhilanthropyChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $127,250 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $40,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado: $20,000 · HealthDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC: $7,500 · Health+3 more: $8,500 · HealthSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentLOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER: $25,000 · EnvironmentHill Country Alliance: $10,000 · EnvironmentMyGoodness Inc: $100,000 · Public BenefitMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $80,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,365,178Education$531,480Philanthropy$351,000Health$203,250Environment$185,000Public Benefit$100,000Recreation & Sports$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $151,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $127,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMyGoodness Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetJOHN MALLINGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $26,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW SCHOOL FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER: $25,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15,080 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HELP GROUP CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCoreGiving Co: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOne World Childrens Fund: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Team Mentoring Inc: $6,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Violence Law Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP PADDLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Silk Family Found…Van Konynenburg Found…The Rose Hills Founda…The Annenberg Foundat…Jewish Community Foun…Orange County Communi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Goldman Sachs Cha…March Family Foundati…The Crail-Johnson Fou…California Community …Silicon Valley Commun…
The Silk Family FoundationID26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Silk Family Foundation · Van Konynenburg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Orange County Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · March Family Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jay and Carol Borzi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home