Skip to content

· Private foundation

James T and Michelle a Ryan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$650k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.7MPhilanthropy$174kReligion$35kHuman Services$17kHousing & Shelter$9kHealth$2kCivil Rights$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$650,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$532,944
BALL STATE UNIVERSITY$373,500
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY$200,000
GREENLIGHT FUND CHICAGO$40,000
LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SHELTER$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$1,000
JEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION$500
LAKOTA FRIENDS CIRCLE$500
BILTMOREDOUGLAS HUDSON SR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAKOTA FRIENDS CIRCLE: $500 → 29%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $500 → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH AND FMAILY SERVICES: $500 → 14%SALUTE INC: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH AND FMAILY SERVICES: $200 → 14%SALUTE INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
UT
VA
AZ
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 17 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$7.9M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+45%

Still filing today

35%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +25%
  • MU
    Miami University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +14%
  • SI
    SALUTE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAELS CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • DC
    DEPAUL COLLEGE PREP
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
6
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
9
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
10
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
11
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BALL STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,581,125 · OtherBALL STATE UNIVERSITYMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $2,050,000 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $949,134 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY+15 more: $223,799 · OtherDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $1,875,200 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYMiami University Foundation: $200,000 · EducationMiami University FoundationSALUTE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $700 · Human ServicesHouse of the Good Shepherd: $500 · Human ServicesLakota Friends Circle: $500 · Human ServicesLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 · HealthWorking Bikes: $1,000 · InternationalThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $250 · Religion
Other$5,804,058Education$2,075,200Human Services$11,700Housing & Shelter$9,100Philanthropy$2,000Health$1,700International$1,000Religion$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $1,875,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMiami University Foundation: $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSALUTE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWorking Bikes: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouse of the Good Shepherd: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLakota Friends Circle: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SALUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Working Bikes ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds House of the Good Shepherd ↗
  • Who funds Lakota Friends Circle ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James T and Michelle a Ryan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James T and Michelle a Ryan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James T and Michelle a Ryan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James T and Michelle a Ryan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James T and Michelle a Ryan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph