Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$530
Largest grant, FY2025
$75,154
Organizations funded a year
7 to 20
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$1.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$84k50%
FY202410$65k50%
FY202310$63k40%
FY202220$68k65%
FY20219$75k67%
FY20207$41k29%
FY20198$34k50%
FY201814$24k64%
88% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$288kReligion$80kHuman Services$19kHealth$8kEducation$5kEnvironment$839Youth Development$692International$546Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DE
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Makom Solel Lakeside$43,9967n/a
Congregation Solel$34,5502n/a
Lake County Crisis Center$18,31370%
Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation$3,05010%
Hfs Chicago Scholars$1,81630%
The Dragonfly Foundation$1,25910%
Chicago Horticultural Society$83960%
Lchaim Center of the Northshore Inc$6801n/a
Breakthrough T1d$43040%
American Friends of Jordan River Village Foundation$42010%
Show all 35 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 26 recipients with no EIN on record ($369k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake County Crisis Center: $18,313 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $3,050 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHfs Chicago Scholars: $1,816 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Dragonfly Foundation: $1,259 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Horticultural Society: $839 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBreakthrough T1d: $430 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jordan River Village Foundation: $420 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Michael Matters Foundation Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSummer Camp Opportunities Promote Education Inc: $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Kids Network Inc: $340 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRett Syndrome Research Trust Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Baldrick's Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc: $194 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKeshet: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Service of Glencoe: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHandson Suburban Chicago: $127 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Maddie Kramer Foundation d/b/a Dancing While Cancering: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDementia Society Inc: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTriple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Sports Inc: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Cancer Research Fund Inc: $56 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohn and Matthew Gaudreau Foundation: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLost Boyzinc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation: $27 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Chubb Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein with peer funders

About Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein

How much does Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein give?
Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein reported 11 grants totaling $83,951 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 20 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (60%), Religion (17%), Human Services (4%).
Who are Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Makom Solel Lakeside ($44k), Congregation Solel ($35k), Lake County Crisis Center ($18k).
Does Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, AbbVie Foundation, The Chicago Community Trust.
Where is Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein based?
Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack & Shirley Dubow Charitable Foundation C/O Nancy Himmelstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph