Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Kent McNew Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$151kEducation$83kEnvironment$29kAnimals$4kYouth Development$3kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$250
Median grant
7
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Anne Arundel Medical Foundation$25,000
AACC Foundation$12,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$1,000
St Andrew's United Methodist Church$500
VES Land Trust$400
The Light House$400
The Salvation Army$400
St Joseph's Indian School$300
SPCA of Anne Arundel County$300
The Nature Conservancy$300
Eastern Shore of VA Community Foundation$250
ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION$250
Chesapeake Wildlife Heritage$250
BARRIER ISLANDS CENTER$250
Providence Center Inc$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $90) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Boys Town: $90 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
SD
PA
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$277k · 37 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
5

Total granted

$277k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+26%

Still filing today

65%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $395 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +49%
  • AR
    ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +23%
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CC
    CROWNSVILLE CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +571%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200 · revenue +17%
  • WV
    WACHAPREAGUE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100 · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
4
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

7
National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc

To provide technical information and scientific research to the forest products industry needed to achieve environmental goals and principles.

8
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Youth Development CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionGovernment Accountability R…Senior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Hospice Care ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Community FoundationsIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr16%74%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,815

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Anne Arundel Medical Foundation — $150,200 · OtherAnne Arundel Medical Foundation+27 more — $18,840 · Other+27 moreANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $62,000 · EducationANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE F…VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationVALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FO…+1 more — $175 · EducationARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC — $15,407 · EnvironmentARUNDEL R…CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $4,600 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAK…CROWNSVILLE CONSERVANCY INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentCROWNSVIL…+4 more — $1,190 · EnvironmentSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC — $2,050 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $650 · AnimalsPURPLE MARTIN CONSERVATION ASSOC — $200 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $125 · Animals+3 more — $300 · AnimalsEASTERN SHORE OF VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,800 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $500 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$169,040Education$82,175Environment$23,197Animals$3,325Philanthropy$2,300Youth Development$2,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $62,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC — $15,407 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $4,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC — $2,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN SHORE OF VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $610 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $410 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $405 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPURPLE MARTIN CONSERVATION ASSOC — $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $135 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND WESTIE RESCUE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWACHAPREAGUE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $98 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MD INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds CROWNSVILLE CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds EASTERN SHORE OF VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL CO
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc
  • Who funds MARYLAND LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC
  • Who funds PURPLE MARTIN CONSERVATION ASSOC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Geaton and Joann Decesaris Family Foundation Inc · Koch Family Foundation Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Kent McNew Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Arundel Rivers Federation Inc19% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph