Skip to content

· Public charity

Islands Hana Mana Inc

Implement innovative solutions to often un-insured patient care needs while mobilizing kingdom resources throughout the world to address many of the most pressing medical and social issues facing our global community.

$541k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$2.7MHousing & Shelter$841kInternational$799kEducation$619kHealth$445kHuman Services$187kCommunity Improvement$132kCrime & Legal$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $435k
$36,868
Median grant
6
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$200,004
ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC CHURCH$75,000
CHILDREN OF THE AMERICAS DBA MEXICO RED$60,000
PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER$50,000
CATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
YOUTH APOSTLES$36,868
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$35,000
LA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
ALL HALLOWS ACADEMY$10,000
PUENTE DE AMISTAD$7,070
NEW CONVENANT COG$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $414k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PUENTE DE AMISTAD: $32k → 6%PUENTE DE AMISTAD: $9k → 6%PUENTE DE AMISTAD: $7k → 6%PUENTE DE AMISTAD: $6k → 6%PATWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $120k → 15%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $120k → 15%PATWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 15%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 15%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
VA
TN
NC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 14 repeat orgs$485k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$5.4M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+10%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    C N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $672k · revenue +243% · 42% of their budget
  • PA
    Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $360k · revenue ×12
  • PO
    Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home
    3× · 2020–2022 · $360k · revenue +341% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · $115k · revenue +0%
  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF SAINT ANTHONY
    one grant, 2020 · $83k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Hui Pohala

Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…

Health
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Hope Services Hawaii Inc

Hope services hawaii provides housing-focused interventions to end homelessness through a continuum of services, including homeless prevention and diversion, mobile outreach, medical respite, street medicine, in- shelter medical attention,…

—
6
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
7
Haven of Hope International Inc

Haven of hope international (hohi) is at the forefront of orphan care innovation with its mission to raise the standard of care for orphans left behind and abandoned by traditional adoption systems. its mission is simple and specific:…

International
8
Hoomau Ke Ola

Ho`omau ke ola provides comprehensive rehabilitation services including residential and outpatient care, treatment, and counseling to persons recovering from problems related to persons with mental and substance abuse disorders. ho`omau ke…

Health
9
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

—
10
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
11
Ihs the Institute for Human Services Inc

Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.

Housing & Shelter
12
Catholic Charities Hawaii

Carry out the social mission of the church by serving the people of hawai'i, regardless of their faith or culture.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify; the most unlike its peers is Puente De Amistad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA JOLLA COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $910,000 · OtherLA JOLLA COMMUNITY CHURCH INCYOUTH APOSTLES INSTITUTE: $835,468 · OtherYOUTH APOSTLES INSTITUTEC N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST: $671,677 · OtherC N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUSTPASTOR OF ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC PARISH IN LA JOLLA CA A CORP SOLE: $462,000 · OtherPASTOR OF ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC PARISH IN LA JOLLA CA A CORP SOLEFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HONOLULU: $381,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HONOLULU+5 more: $250,340 · Other+5 moreProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $360,000 · ReligionProject Orphan…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $214,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PU…HAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC: $130,000 · ReligionHAWAIIAN ISLAN…Sequoia Unlimited Inc: $35,000 · ReligionEdify: $360,000 · InternationalEdifyMexico RED: $210,000 · InternationalMexico REDPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $360,000 · Human ServicesPUENTE DE AMISTAD INC: $53,570 · Human ServicesHAWAII HOMELESS HEALTHCARE HUI: $324,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS HAWAII: $30,000 · HealthNATURAL HIGH: $162,000 · Community ImprovementVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $115,000 · Civil RightsALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,510,985Religion$739,000International$570,000Human Services$413,570Health$389,000Community Improvement$162,000Civil Rights$115,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetC N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST: $671,677 over 5y, 42% of budgetPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $360,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $360,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetEdify: $360,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHAWAII HOMELESS HEALTHCARE HUI: $324,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $214,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMexico RED: $210,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetNATURAL HIGH: $162,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC: $130,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $115,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSequoia Unlimited Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS HAWAII: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds C N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII HOMELESS HEALTHCARE HUI ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Mexico RED ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HIGH ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Sequoia Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Islands Hana Mana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Islands Hana Mana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Islands Hana Mana Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Islands Hana Mana Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Islands Hana Mana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph