· Public charity
Islands Hana Mana Inc
Implement innovative solutions to often un-insured patient care needs while mobilizing kingdom resources throughout the world to address many of the most pressing medical and social issues facing our global community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $435k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $200,004 |
| ALL HALLOWS CATHOLIC CHURCH | $75,000 |
| CHILDREN OF THE AMERICAS DBA MEXICO RED | $60,000 |
| PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER | $50,000 |
| CATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| YOUTH APOSTLES | $36,868 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| LA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| ALL HALLOWS ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| PUENTE DE AMISTAD | $7,070 |
| NEW CONVENANT COG | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $414k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNC N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST5× · 2020–2024 · $672k · revenue +243% · 42% of their budget
- PAPathways Adult Learning Center Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $360k · revenue ×12
- POProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home3× · 2020–2022 · $360k · revenue +341% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- VFVOICES FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2021 · $115k · revenue +0%
- CDCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTONone grant, 2021 · $100k
- DODIOCESE OF SAINT ANTHONYone grant, 2020 · $83k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…
Religious
Hope services hawaii provides housing-focused interventions to end homelessness through a continuum of services, including homeless prevention and diversion, mobile outreach, medical respite, street medicine, in- shelter medical attention,…
Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…
Haven of hope international (hohi) is at the forefront of orphan care innovation with its mission to raise the standard of care for orphans left behind and abandoned by traditional adoption systems. its mission is simple and specific:…
Ho`omau ke ola provides comprehensive rehabilitation services including residential and outpatient care, treatment, and counseling to persons recovering from problems related to persons with mental and substance abuse disorders. ho`omau ke…
To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.
Carry out the social mission of the church by serving the people of hawai'i, regardless of their faith or culture.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify and the most unlike its peers is Puente De Amistad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds C N WODEHOUSE SALVATION ARMY TRUST ↗
- Who funds Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds HAWAII HOMELESS HEALTHCARE HUI ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Mexico RED ↗
- Who funds NATURAL HIGH ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Sequoia Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Islands Hana Mana Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Islands Hana Mana Inc?
Find your warmest path to Islands Hana Mana Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.