Skip to content
Islamic Medical Association of North America at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Islamic Medical Association of North America

Imana fosters health promotion, disease prevention, and health maintenance in communities around the world through direct patient care, health programs, and advocacy.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$177k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

International$857kHealth$341kPublic Safety & Disaster$77k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $672,454, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,775,875 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,103,421 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $574k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED MUSLIM RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT$176,979
B'DESH FOUNDATION$141,826
SEED$100,000
AL MUSTAFA CHARITABLE TRUST$100,000
COMPREHESIVE DISASTER$55,000
PURE HANDS INC$48,649
ZAKAT FOUNDATION$25,000
EQUALLY ABLE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AL MUSTAFA CHARITABLE TRUST: $107k → 6%AL MUSTAFA CHARITABLE TRUST: $106k → 6%AL MUSTAFA CHARITABLE TRUST: $100k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
NJ
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.1M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$680k · 62% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

South Asia$248k · 23% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$96k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$75k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    United Mission For Relief & Development
    3× · 2023–2025 · $470k · revenue +160%
  • BD
    B DESH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $308k · revenue +0%
  • SF
    SUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $307k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AR
    Africa Relief and Community Developmentgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue +52%
  • SA
    Sudanese American Physicians Assngraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +107%
  • HP
    HEAL PALESTINE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
2
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
3
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
5
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Humanitarian African Relief Organization

To help africans in need. our main focus is getting food, shelter, clothing and medicine to the needy

International
7
Alsajdah Foundation
Religion
8
Doctors to the World

Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.

—
9
Shakir Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
10
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
11
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Zakat Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Al Mustafa Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

B DESH FOUNDATION: $308,076 · InternationalB DESH FOUNDATIONSUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $307,000 · InternationalSUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTPURE HANDS INC: $109,720 · InternationalPURE HANDS INCAfrica Relief and Community Development: $55,000 · InternationalAfrica Relief and Community DevelopmentSudanese American Physicians Assn: $50,000 · InternationalSudanese American Physicians Assn+1 more: $25,000 · InternationalUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $469,890 · Public Safety & DisasterUnited Mission For Relief & Develop…COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $131,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEFAl Mustafa Charitable Trust: $313,400 · Human ServicesAl Mustafa Charitab…EQUALLYABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesEQUALLYABLE FOUNDAT…AGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $62,500 · EducationTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK: $20,000 · Community ImprovementMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $12,000 · HealthCLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Recreation & Sports
International$854,796Public Safety & Disaster$601,390Human Services$338,400Education$62,500Other$50,000Community Improvement$20,000Health$12,000Recreation & Sports$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $469,890 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAl Mustafa Charitable Trust: $313,400 over 3y, 17% of budgetB DESH FOUNDATION: $308,076 over 3y, 10% of budgetSUPPORT FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $307,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $131,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $109,720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $62,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAfrica Relief and Community Development: $55,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSudanese American Physicians Assn: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEAL PALESTINE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Commu…Texas Instruments Fou…Renaissance Charitabl…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…
American Muslim Community FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Islamic Medical Association of North America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Islamic Medical Association of North America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Islamic Medical Association of North America?

    Find your warmest path to Islamic Medical Association of North America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Islamic Medical Association of North America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home