Skip to content
Intact Charitable Trust USA at a glance

· Private foundation

Intact Charitable Trust USA

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$610k
Granted FY2025still arriving
105
Grants FY2025still arriving
27
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$684kPhilanthropy$316kHuman Services$207kFood & Nutrition$186kHealth$180kCrime & Legal$109kYouth Development$104kHousing & Shelter$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 105 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k88 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $287k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
$1,500
Median grant
27
States reached
$167k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$82,450
SCHOOL ON WHEELS MA$60,000
SCHOLARSHIP OF AMERICA$45,000
UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS$26,700
NY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS & CHILDRENS BENEFIT$25,000
ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION$25,000
BLAZE BASKETBALL CLUB$25,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$23,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF COLORADO$22,500
NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE$15,000
IMA FOUNDATION$15,000
THE BARNEY AND BARNEY FOUNDATION$15,000
PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION$10,000
CHRYSALIS CENTER INC$10,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PERSONAL BEST CHARITY: $5k → 11%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $10k → 13%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER: $1k → 11%HIP DONELSON INC: $2k → 14%FORREST SPENCE FUND: $2k → 17%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $3k → 4%CREATIVE THERAPY CARE: $2k → 8%THE PERSONAL BEST CHARITY: $5k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $3k → 4%SPECIALLY GIFTED FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PERSONAL BEST CHARITY: $5k → 11%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $5k → 9%HIP DONELSON INC: $2k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY IN: $3k → 4%PERSONAL BEST CHARITY: $3k → 11%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $27k → 16%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $5k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY: $3k → 4%PERSONAL BEST CHARITY: $3k → 11%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $25k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY: $3k → 4%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $25k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $20k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $20k → 16%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS - USES: $1k → 16%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $5k → 9%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $1k → 16%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $3k → 11%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%UNITED SOUTHEND SETTLEMENTS: $1k → 16%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%MOUNTAIN SHADOWQ FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%MOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%ABILITY FIRST: $3k → 14%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $3k → 11%CATERINAS CLUB: $3k → 10%COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $3k → 11%CATERINAS CLUB: $1k → 10%COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHIDREN INC: $1k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $3k → 16%EMERGE MOTHERS ACADEMY: $3k → 11%EMERGE MOTHERS ACADAME: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 137 repeat orgs$616k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

137 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
168

Total granted

$2.2M
$442k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+5%

Still filing today

65%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $189k · revenue +16%
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $110k · revenue +18%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOLARSHIP OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $48k
  • TD
    THE DEIDRE O'BRIEN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RC
    RBS CENTER FOR WOMEN IN BUSINESS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation

Through philanthropy, empower current and future food and nutrition practitioners to optimize global health.

Health
12
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ima Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

200 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 200 of the 349 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
193/200
Grantees still filing
119/200
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOOL ON WHEELS MA: $120,000 · OtherSCHOOL ON WHEELS MAINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUND: $101,750 · OtherINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $100,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $99,200 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICANEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $80,500 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSCHOLARSHIP OF AMERICA: $48,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $47,000 · Other+117 more: $749,050 · Other+117 moreSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $110,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS …THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $73,000 · EducationTHE ACTUARIAL FOU…DENVER KIDS INC: $50,000 · EducationDENVER KIDS INCUPTURNSHIPS INC: $50,000 · EducationUPTURNSHIPS INCSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $45,000 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP AMERI…WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS: $20,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $18,500 · EducationCALIFORNIA MARITIME ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Education+8 more: $42,000 · Education+8 moreINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $188,800 · PhilanthropyINSURANCE IND…BARNEY & BARNEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyBARNEY & BARN…THE SURETY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SURETY FO…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $11,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $121,350 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUT…Personal Best Charity Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesPersonal Be…EMMAUS INC: $16,250 · Human ServicesEMMAUS INCWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $15,000 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUB: $11,250 · Human ServicesYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Human Services+12 more: $41,500 · Human Services+12 moreFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $85,000 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $8,500 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS OF HOPE INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+5 more: $11,500 · Food & NutritionDEIRDRE O'BRIEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $45,000 · Crime & LegalORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Crime & LegalPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $23,500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $12,500 · HealthHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $10,000 · HealthFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $6,500 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $5,100 · HealthCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $5,000 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,403 · Health+5 more: $11,137 · Health
Other$1,345,500Education$423,500Philanthropy$309,800Human Services$272,850Food & Nutrition$130,000Crime & Legal$107,500Health$99,640

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $188,800 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $121,350 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $110,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $80,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBARNEY & BARNEY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetTHE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION: $73,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDENVER KIDS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUPTURNSHIPS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetDEIRDRE O'BRIEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $29,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIMA FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $25,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $23,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $23,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPersonal Best Charity Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE SURETY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriendship Service Center Inc: $17,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEMMAUS INC: $16,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA MARITIME ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $11,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAYMAKERS FOR HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable Foun…Rockland Trust Charit…The Andover Companies…Td Charitable Foundat…Eastern Bank Foundati…Liberty Mutual Founda…American Tower Corpor…The Gap FoundationCh Robinson Worldwide…Ion Bank Foundation I…Analog Devices Founda…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…
Chubb Charitable FoundationPA18.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Andover Companies Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Intact Charitable Trust USA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Intact Charitable Trust USA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Chrysalis Center Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Friendship Service Center Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Morris County Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Hull Lifesaving Museum Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Eastie Farm Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Emmaus Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
  • Nichols College: 0% of income from government
  • Insurance Library Association of Boston: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Intact Charitable Trust USA?

Find your warmest path to Intact Charitable Trust USA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 349 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Intact Charitable Trust USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home