Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Institute for Law & Systems Research

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$501kEnvironment$155kYouth Development$27kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$537k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST SCHOOL OF WOODEN BOAT BUI$100,000
SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$25,950
SYNERGY ARTS FOUNDATION$5,025
VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$3,000
COMMUNITY BOAT PROJECT$2,000
KPBS$1,200
ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Children of the Nations: $480 → 10%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%Elderhelp: $2k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 51% of Institute for Law & Systems Research’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 41% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Institute for Law & Systems Researchlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$626k · 12 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$626k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+5%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding
    8× · 2017–2024 · $337k · revenue +82%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +48%
  • VM
    VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +513%

Funded once

  • CC
    Canebrake County Water District
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • SJ
    SOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -32% · 49% of their budget
  • DO
    DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
4
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
5
San Diego Bird Alliance

Together we defend the regions birds, unique biodiversity and threatened habitats through advocacy, education and restoration.

Environment
6
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
7
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
8
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
9
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
10
San Diego Canyonlands Inc

To promote, protect and restore the natural habitats in San Diego County's canyons and creeks. We do this by fostering education and ongoing community involvement in stewardship and advocacy, and by collaborating with other organizations.

Environment
11
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
12
Schmidt Ocean Institute
Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Society of Natural History and the most unlike its peers is Dignity of Man Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding — $336,825 · Arts & CultureNorthwest School of Wooden BoatbuildingSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY — $143,485 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUND…Canebrake County Water District — $39,726 · OtherCanebrake County Wate…Community Boat Project — $22,000 · OtherCommunity Boat Projec…DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION — $6,500 · OtherKPBS — $6,400 · OtherSYNERGY ARTS FOUNDATION — $5,025 · Other+11 more — $11,512 · Other+11 moreSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL — $32,500 · EnvironmentWILDCOAST — $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION — $29,050 · PhilanthropySOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION — $20,232 · Recreation & SportsELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $6,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS — $480 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,666 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$481,310Other$136,163Environment$37,500Philanthropy$29,050Recreation & Sports$20,232Human Services$6,980Housing & Shelter$2,666

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorthwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding — $336,825 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY — $143,485 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL — $32,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION — $29,050 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION — $20,232 over 1y, 49% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILDCOAST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $2,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $1,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAcademy of Music for the Blind — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILD FISH CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS — $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds WILDCOAST
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds CLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN
  • Who funds Academy of Music for the Blind
  • Who funds WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Institute for Law & Systems Research funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph