· Public charity
Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust
To increase awareness and improve access to breast cancer screening, diagnosis and support services throughout indiana.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $224,192 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $293,132 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $182k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $29,992 |
| UNITED HEALTH SERVICES | $27,096 |
| YWCA GREATER LAFAYETTE | $24,747 |
| PARKVIEW HOSPITAL INC | $22,499 |
| GENNESARET FREE CLINIC | $21,585 |
| FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION | $21,369 |
| ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $14,918 |
| NEWDAY FOUNDATION OF LAPORTE | $10,000 |
| ST ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| CANCER SERVICES OF GRANT COUNTY | $9,564 |
| MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $9,420 |
| ASCENSION ST VINCENT EVANSVILLE FOUNDATION | $8,752 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN | $7,808 |
| ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $6,442 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $581k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $277k · revenue +2%
- GFGENNESARET FREE CLINIC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +29%
- DHDEACONESS HOSPITAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- LHLAPORTE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $18k
- FFFRANCINE'S FRIENDS INCone grant, 2017 · $16k
- FMFLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Provide philanthropic support to help provide services, equipment, resources and education for indiana university health paoli, inc. ("iu health paoli") to meet the healthcare needs of our community well into the future.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Foundation of La Porte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GENNESARET FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANDERSON AND MADISON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF GRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PARKVIEW HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Rush Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds SHALOM HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St Catherine Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds PARKVIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEWDAY FOUNDATION OF LAPORTE INC ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗
- Who funds Pink-4-Ever Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER- SOUTH BEND CAMPUS INC ↗
- Who funds MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds CAMERON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LAPORTE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Indiana Hospital Association Inc · St Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · District 10 Hospital Preparedness · 24 Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust?
Find your warmest path to Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.