How much did 24 Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

24 Foundation Inc reported 13 grants totaling $2,072,809 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is 24 Foundation Inc based?

24 Foundation Inc is based in NC.

24 Foundation Inc

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

24 Foundation Inc

24 foundation's vision is to have cancer navigation and survivorship for all.

$2.1M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$473k

Largest

01What you fund

0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$2.4MHuman Services$378kEducation$209kPhilanthropy$168kReligion$5kOther$374k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

patients abletransportedspecifically followingpatients advancedfertilitypatientsurvivors

2019

patients advancedsurvivorswomennavigatingguidanceinsurancematerials

2020

financial childrenlevine children'snavigatingchildhoodsurvivorstreatmentchildren recently

2021

children recentlyrecently diagnosedsurvivors

2022

financial pediatric

2023

financial pediatricprecision medicine

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k11 grants · $189k
$250k+1 grant · $473k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

Atrium Health Foundation$472,500
Claires Army$25,000
Pinky Swear$24,000
Nothing Pink$20,000
Casting Carolinas$20,000
Hospitality House$20,000
Go Jen Go$15,000
Feast For Good$15,000
Move For Jenn$15,000
Isabella Santos Foundation$15,000
CLT Foundation$10,000
Queens University$10,000
SECU Family House$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $201k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.2M · 21 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.2M

$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+87%

Still filing today

90%

73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +195%
CA
Claires Army
7× · 2018–2024 · $166k · revenue +116%
GJ
Go Jen Go
8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +247%

Funded once

L
LIVESTRONG
one grant, 2017 · $100k
INDIANA UNIVERSITY SIMON CANCER CENTER
one grant, 2017 · $55k · revenue -7%
CC
CURE CHASERS CYCLING INC
one grant, 2020 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health

Hoosier Cancer Research Network Inc

To reduce the burden of cancer by advancing cancer research, education, and patient advocacy.

Health

The Breast Cancer Research

Prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster

Hers Breast Cancer Foundation

To support all individuals healing from breast cancer by providing post-surgical products and services regardless of financial status.

Health

Pretty in Pink Foundation Inc

Philanthropy

Breast Cancer Angels

Provide immediate direct financial and emotional support to patients undergoing breast cancer treatment.

Health

Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care

—

Play for Pink Inc

To support research related to the causes, cures, and prevention of breast cancer.

Crime & Legal

Lets Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

Let's win pancreatic cancer foundation is a web-based platform that enables doctors, scientists and patients to share fast-breaking information on potentially life-saving pancreatic cancer treatments & clinical trials.

Health

Virginia Breast Cancer Foundation

The Virginia Breast Cancer Foundation (VBCF) empowers Virginians impacted by breast cancer through access, advocacy, education, and community action.

Health

Inflammatory Breast Cancer International

To bring about lifesaving breakthroughs for those affected by inflammatory breast cancer.

Health

Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

Easing the burden for wyoming cancer patients and their families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Red Door Cancer Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indiana University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

13%

6,816/53,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

22/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$2,385,050Human Services$378,250Other$373,615Education$208,750Philanthropy$168,200Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC15.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Indiana Breast Cancer Awareness Trust · The Presbyterian Hospital · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Albemarle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · McKesson Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation 24 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Starr Nolan.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 472578360 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Starr Nolan, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 27% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to 24 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 24 Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

24 Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to 24 Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

24 Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to 24 Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph