Skip to content

· Public charity

Impact Oklahoma Inc

To increase philanthropy in oklahoma by bringing together a community of women devoted to impacting central oklahoma to fund charitable organizations working in the areas of family, culture, health wellness, community education.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$112kCommunity Improvement$100kHousing & Shelter$100kYouth Development$100kFood & Nutrition$49kArts & Culture$25kHealth$12kReligion$12k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$24,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$544k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORHOOD HOPE HOUSE$100,000
OKC POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$100,000
ST LUKE'S COMMUNITY MARKET$24,500
MEALS ON WHEELS NORMAN$24,500
OKLAHOMA CITY BALLET$24,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAVANNAH STATION THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $12k → 9%PEPPERS RANCH FOSTER COMMUNITY: $12k → 12%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
2
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
5
Oklahoma Alternative Resources

Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
6
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
7
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
8
Living Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc

To offer hope, loving suppport, and education to individuals and families before, during, and after pregnancy.

—
9
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
10
Oklahoma Afterschool Network Inc

Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.

—
11
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
12
Preservation Oklahoma Inc

To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Hope Dealers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN…PEPPERS RANCH INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH INCSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $12,000 · Human ServicesSavannah Station TRP Incorp…ARISE SINGLE MOMS INC: $100,000 · ReligionARISE SINGLE MOMS INCRESTOREOKC INC: $12,000 · ReligionRESTOREOKC INCOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE A…NEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEALERS INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEAL…Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $24,500 · Food & NutritionBALLET OKLAHOMA INC: $24,500 · Arts & CultureST LUKES METHODIST CHURCH INC: $24,500 · Other
Human Services$124,000Religion$112,000Youth Development$100,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Food & Nutrition$24,500Arts & Culture$24,500Other$24,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetARISE SINGLE MOMS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEALERS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetBALLET OKLAHOMA INC: $24,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $12,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · Servant Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact Oklahoma Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact Oklahoma Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact Oklahoma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph