Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Impact Oklahoma Inc

To increase philanthropy in oklahoma by bringing together a community of women devoted to impacting central oklahoma to fund charitable organizations working in the areas of family, culture, health wellness, community education.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Human Services$112kCommunity Improvement$100kHousing & Shelter$100kYouth Development$100kFood & Nutrition$49kArts & Culture$25kHealth$12kReligion$12k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$24,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$544k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKC POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$100,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOPE HOUSE$100,000
ST LUKE'S COMMUNITY MARKET$24,500
OKLAHOMA CITY BALLET$24,500
MEALS ON WHEELS NORMAN$24,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAVANNAH STATION THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $12k → 9%PEPPERS RANCH FOSTER COMMUNITY: $12k → 12%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
2
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
3
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
4
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

6
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

7
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
8
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
9
Oklahoma Alternative Resources

Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
10
Living Hope Pregnancy Center of Ponca City Inc

To offer hope, loving suppport, and education to individuals and families before, during, and after pregnancy.

11
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
12
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Hope Dealers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN…Savannah Station TRP Incorporation — $12,000 · Human ServicesSavannah Station TRP Incorp…PEPPERS RANCH INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH INCARISE SINGLE MOMS INC — $100,000 · ReligionARISE SINGLE MOMS INCRESTOREOKC INC — $12,000 · ReligionRESTOREOKC INCOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE A…NEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEALERS INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEAL…ST LUKES METHODIST CHURCH INC — $24,500 · OtherBALLET OKLAHOMA INC — $24,500 · Arts & CultureMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $24,500 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$124,000Religion$112,000Youth Development$100,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Other$24,500Arts & Culture$24,500Food & Nutrition$24,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOPE DEALERS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetARISE SINGLE MOMS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBALLET OKLAHOMA INC — $24,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation — $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC — $12,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · Servant Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Impact Oklahoma Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph