Skip to content
Impact 100 East Bay Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Impact 100 East Bay Inc

Impact 100 East Bay is a women's collective giving and grant-making organization which awards alameda and contra costa county non-profit groups with funds for transformational, innovative and impactful programs to address community needs that are often delayed or underserved.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$500kCrime & Legal$286kEmployment$278kCivil Rights$216kFood & Nutrition$176kHuman Services$109kHousing & Shelter$109kYouth Development$76kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $335,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $352,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$86,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$712k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Planting Justice$101,000
Child Advocates of CCC$86,000
Hack The Hood$76,000
Opportunity Junction$72,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Covenant House California: $109k → 10%Meals on Wheels Diablo Region: $25k → 9%Covenant House California: $109k → 10%White Pony Express: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 5 repeat orgs$612k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $177k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
    3× · 2019–2025 · $302k · revenue +100%
  • OJ
    OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $278k · revenue +63%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $218k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Alameda County CASA Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $108k · revenue +118% · 53% of their budget
  • BP
    Biotech Partners
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • MI
    MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $55k · revenue +65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
3
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
4
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc

CASA recruits, trains, and supports community volunteers who advocate for chidren and youth throughout their journey in foster care.

Crime & Legal
6
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
7
Floreciendo

The mission of Oakland Bloom is to advance food and economic justice community power and resilience with working-class immigrant and diaspora chef-entrepreneurs. Oakland Bloom does this through stewarding Open Test Kitchen as a kitchen and…

Employment
8
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
9
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
10
Urban Habitat Program

Urban Habitat democratizes power and advances equitable policies to create a just and connected Bay Area for low-income communities of color. We confront structural inequities impacting historically disenfranchised communities. Through…

Community Improvement
11
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
12
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Motivating Inspiring Supporting and Serving Sexually Exploited Youth; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Diablo Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Resources for Science: $200,000 · EducationCommunity Resources for ScienceASPIRE EDUCATION PROJECT: $200,000 · EducationASPIRE EDUCATION PROJECTBiotech Partners: $100,000 · EducationBiotech PartnersCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $302,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES OF CO…JUSTICE AT LAST INC: $37,000 · Civil RightsJUSTICE AT LAST INCCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $218,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CAL…WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $50,000 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EXPRESSMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS DI…OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $278,000 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY JUNCT…Friends of Alameda County CASA Inc: $108,000 · Crime & LegalFriends of…MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $55,000 · Crime & LegalMOTIVATING…Planting Justice: $101,000 · EnvironmentHack the Hood Inc: $76,000 · Arts & CultureDENTISTS ON WHEELS: $35,000 · OtherRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $25,000 · Other
Education$500,000Civil Rights$339,000Human Services$293,000Employment$278,000Crime & Legal$163,000Environment$101,000Arts & Culture$76,000Other$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: $302,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $278,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $218,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Resources for Science: $200,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetASPIRE EDUCATION PROJECT: $200,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc: $108,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetBiotech Partners: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $55,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJUSTICE AT LAST INC: $37,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDENTISTS ON WHEELS: $35,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Barr Charitable TrustDean and Margaret Les…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Lowell Berry Foundati…Justice Justice Found…Teichert FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…The San Francisco Fou…Antioch Community Fou…John Muir Health
East Bay Community FoundationCA25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Barr Charitable Trust · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta · John Muir Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact 100 East Bay Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact 100 East Bay Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact 100 East Bay’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home