Loading…
· Public charity
Impact 100 East Bay Inc
Grant-making organization which awards Alameda & Contra Costa County non-profit groups with funds for transformational, innovative and impactful programs to address community needs that are often delayed or underserved
$234k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Education$500kHuman Services$293kCivil Rights$253kEmployment$206kCrime & Legal$163kHealth$35kCommunity Improvement$25k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
youthmental health
2021
youth finalinstallment disbursedmental health
2022
installment
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Biotech Partners$100,000
- Community Resources for Science$100,000
- White Pony Express$50,000
- Justice at Last$37,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 5 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
5
Total granted
$1.0M
$248k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+48%
+131%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCovenant House California2× · 2020–2021 · $218k · revenue +48%
- CACourt Appointed Special Advocates Program Inc2× · 2019–2020 · $216k · revenue +151%
- OJOpportunity Junction Inc2× · 2018–2019 · $206k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- CACourt Appointed Special Advocates of Contra Costa Countygraduatedone grant, 2021 · $108k · revenue +131% · 53% of their budget
- MIMISSSEY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $55k · revenue +32%
- DODentists on Wheelsgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Casa of San Mateo County
The mission of Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of San Mateo County is to ensure that all children under the protection of the court have a consistent, caring adult who speaks on their behalf and helps them reach their full…
Crime & Legal
2
Casa of Solano County
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Civil Rights
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Employment
4
Community Action Service & Advocacy
to mobilize communities to create safe and healthy neighborhoods through research, education, advocacy, and service.
—
5
California Court Appointed Special
The mission of california casa is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering californias…
Civil Rights
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates
The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.
Civil Rights
7
San Francisco Casa
San Francisco CASA (formerly San Francisco Court Appointed Special Advocates) transforms the lives of systems-involved and other vulnerable children, young adults and their families by providing consistent, caring volunteer advocates…
Civil Rights
8
Court Appointed Special Advocate
Court appointed special advocates (casa) provides a powerful voice and a meaningful connection for children who have experienced abuse, neglect, and abandonment.
Civil Rights
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates (Casa) of Merced County
Advocate for foster care children in courts. Providing quality intervention and advocacy services for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.
Crime & Legal
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates
To provide specially trained volunteers to represent the best interest of children under protection of the juvenile court because of abuse or neglect.
Civil Rights
11
San Francisco Coalition of Essential
The Mission of SF-CESS is to interrupt and transform current and systemic educational inequities to ensure all students have access to personalized, equitable and high performing schools that believe and demonstrate each student can,…
Education
12
Central California Environmental
To empower our communities and secure our childrens future by eliminating negative enviromental impacts in low income and communities of color in the Central Valley.
Environment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Junction Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dentists On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$500,000Human Services$293,000Civil Rights$253,000Employment$206,000Crime & Legal$163,000Health$35,000Community Improvement$25,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Covenant House California ↗
- Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates Program Inc ↗
- Who funds Opportunity Junction Inc ↗
- Who funds Aspire Education Project ↗
- Who funds Community Resources for Science ↗
- Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Contra Costa County ↗
- Who funds Biotech Partners ↗
- Who funds MISSSEY INC ↗
- Who funds White Pony Express ↗
- Who funds Justice at Last ↗
- Who funds Dentists on Wheels ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Diablo Region ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
East Bay Community FoundationCA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Justice Justice Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Impact 100 East Bay Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Court Appointed Special Advocates of Contra Costa County.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~34 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 943309728 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Court Appointed Special Advocates of Contra Costa County, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 34 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Impact 100 East Bay Inc?
Find your warmest path to Impact 100 East Bay Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines