Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$64kEnvironment$49kEducation$40kArts & Culture$28kFood & Nutrition$24kPhilanthropy$19kHuman Services$17kPublic Benefit$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$323k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENVISION UNLIMITED$10,000
PLANTING JUSTICE$5,000
LIVING TREE ALLIANCE$4,500
EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
DISABILITY LEAD$2,500
BENNINGTON EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$2,150
IMPACT 100 EAST BAY$2,000
CIVICURE$2,000
PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION$1,800
BENNINGTON COLLEGE$1,500
SHAFTBURY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO$1,200
BORDERLESS MAGAZINE$1,000
HUBBARD HALL PROJECTS$1,000
YOUNG CENTER$1,000
JOHN G MCCULLOUGH FREE LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP A MOTHER OUT: $500 → 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $1k → 17%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $10k → 14%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $7k → 14%MEAL ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $500 → 9%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $6k → 14%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $2k → 9%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $5k → 14%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $3k → 14%ALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $1k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $500 → 10%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $1k → 14%UNITED CHILDRENS SERVICES OF BENNINGTON COUNTY: $1k → 11%CARE FOR REAL: $2k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1k → 14%YOUNG CENTER: $1k → 14%YOUNG CENTER: $1k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $3k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1k → 14%PROJECT AGAINST VIOLENT ENCOUNTERS: $500 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $2k → 14%SUNRISE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$205k · 36 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
66

Total granted

$205k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+18%

Still filing today

92%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Envision Unlimited
    8× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +261%
  • BC
    BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +47%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • CA
    CIVIC AND CULTURAL RESTORATION CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue -8%
  • TP
    THE PERSISTENCE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -10%
  • BB
    Better Bennington Corporation
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
4
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
5
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
6
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
10
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
11
Pangea Legal Services

Pangea's mission is to provide deportation defense services, advocate for policy change, and provide education and legal empowerment for our immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
12
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Persistence Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Developmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsLocal Food System Organizat…Policy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesPublic Library OperationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/98
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,467

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/95
Grantees still filing
65/95
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIVICURE — $16,500 · OtherCIVICUREALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $8,500 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKCROSSROADS FUND INC — $7,000 · OtherCROSSROADS FUND INCOAK LEYDEN DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $6,500 · OtherOAK LEYDEN DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INCWomens Cancer Resource Center — $6,250 · OtherCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN — $5,000 · OtherAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago — $5,000 · Other+60 more — $63,950 · Other+60 moreEnvision Unlimited — $37,500 · Human ServicesEnvision UnlimitedTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR…+10 more — $10,300 · Human Services+10 moreBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $13,500 · EducationBENNINGTON COL…DISABILITY LEAD — $6,500 · EducationDISABILITY LEA…Bennington Early Childhood Center Inc — $5,750 · EducationBennington Ear…SURGE INSTITUTE — $3,500 · EducationSURGE INSTITUT…WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $3,500 · EducationWORKING AMERIC…PROTEUS FUND INC — $2,000 · EducationVERMONT ARTS EXCHANGE INC — $1,700 · EducationRURAL EDUCATION ACTION PROJECT — $1,500 · EducationJohn G McCullough Free Library Inc — $1,500 · Education+3 more — $1,750 · EducationLiving Tree Alliance Inc — $36,800 · ReligionLiving Tree Al…CHILDREN RISING INC — $1,500 · Religion+1 more — $500 · ReligionCIVIC AND CULTURAL RESTORATION CORPORATION — $13,699 · Arts & CultureCIVIC AND…Better Bennington Corporation — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBetter Be…CHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $2,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO Y…Borderless Magazine NFP — $2,000 · Arts & CultureBorderles…HUBBARD HALL PROJECTS INC — $1,200 · Arts & CultureVIDEO VERACITY INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $1,550 · Arts & Culture+3 moreImpact 100 East Bay Inc — $8,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,500 · PhilanthropySTRIVE FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION — $1,150 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $550 · Philanthropy+2 more — $750 · PhilanthropyTHE PERSISTENCE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · EnvironmentPlanting Justice — $5,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT WILDERNESS SCHOOL — $1,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $1,000 · Environment+2 more — $950 · Environment
Other$118,700Human Services$55,800Education$41,200Religion$38,800Arts & Culture$26,449Philanthropy$15,950Environment$15,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEnvision Unlimited — $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Tree Alliance Inc — $36,800 over 4y, 24% of budgetCIVIC AND CULTURAL RESTORATION CORPORATION — $13,699 over 1y, 10% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION — $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetImpact 100 East Bay Inc — $8,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PERSISTENCE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOAK LEYDEN DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY LEAD — $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWomens Cancer Resource Center — $6,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBennington Early Childhood Center Inc — $5,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBetter Bennington Corporation — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION INC — $2,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER BENNINGTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEX WORKERS OUTREACH PROJECT — $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLFORWARD — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBorderless Magazine NFP — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDENTISTS ON WHEELS — $1,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVERMONT ARTS EXCHANGE INC — $1,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRURAL EDUCATION ACTION PROJECT — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohn G McCullough Free Library Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN RISING INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT PARKS FOREVER INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE AT LAST INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FOR REAL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR NORTH BENNINGTON INC — $1,350 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF BENNINGTON COUNTY INC — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUBBARD HALL PROJECTS INC — $1,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTRIVE FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION — $1,150 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…Impact 100 East Bay I…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Silicon Valley Commun…The California Wellne…The Chicago Community…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…John D and Catherine …Dean and Margaret Les…Lowell Berry Foundati…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT29× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Impact 100 East Bay Inc · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Project Against Violent Encounters — 100% of income from government
  • Sunrise Family Resource Center Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Peace and Justice Center — 41% of income from government
  • Bennington Early Childhood Center Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
  • Better Bennington Corporation — 24% of income from government
  • Vermont Parks Forever Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Bike Hub — 3% of income from government
  • Prospect Mountain Association Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Vermont Journalism Trust Ltd — 0% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barr Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Barr Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines