Skip to content
Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$250kHousing & Shelter$178kHuman Services$178kPhilanthropy$70kHealth$65kEnvironment$46kReligion$40kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPORTABLE - PARALYMPIC SPORT CLUB$25,000
NEWDEAL FORUM$20,000
PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$20,000
CENTRAL VA LEGAL AID SOCIETY$20,000
CROSSOVER HEALTHCARE MINISTRY$20,000
REESTABLISH RICHMOND$20,000
HEALTH BRIGADE$20,000
CARITAS$20,000
FEED MORE$20,000
CHILDSAVERS-MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CTR$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NC - CHAPEL HILL$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$10,000
SUPPORTWORKS HOUSING$10,000
JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION$5,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NEWDEAL FORUM: $20k → 14%REESTABLISH RICHMOND: $20k → 22%SPORTABLE: $10k → 22%SHALOM FARMS: $3k → 9%PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 9%PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 9%PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 9%SPORTABLE: $5k → 22%SPORTABLE: $5k → 22%THE HIVE: $3k → 22%SPORTABLE: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$929k · 30 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
4

Total granted

$929k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-5%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CARITAS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +44%
  • CM
    CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $45k · revenue +97%
  • DR
    DIVERSITY RICHMOND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -5%
  • NN
    NRDC - NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TH
    THE HIVE MENTALITY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce

Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.

—
2
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
3
Greater Richmond Partnership Inc

GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.

Public Benefit
4
Startup Virginia Inc

Startup virginia is a non-profit, high-growth-business incubator, dedicated to building a long-term, sustainable economy for virginia. we connect our startup community to exceptional mentors and extensive programs in a dynamic workspace.

Community Improvement
5
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
6
Richmonders for Good Jobs

Operate as a virginia referendum committee; operate as a labor-management cooperation committee in accordance with the federal labor-management cooperation act in order to improve communication between representatives of labor and…

—
7
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
9
The Richmond Forum

To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead.

—
10
Richmond County Partnership for Children Inc

Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…

Education
11
Communities in Schools of Richmond Inc

To champion the connection of needed community resources with schools to help young people successfully learn, stay in school and prepare for life.

Crime & Legal
12
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Re-Establish Richmond Inc; the most unlike its peers is Communities in Schools of Va. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
15/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $45,000 · OtherCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINICUNIVERSITY OF NC CHAPEL: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NC CHAPELSPORTABLE - PARALYMPIC SPORT CLUB: $35,000 · OtherSPORTABLE - PARALYMPIC SPORT CLUBCHILDSAVERS-MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CTR: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $30,000 · OtherSupportWorks Housing: $30,000 · Other+16 more: $177,500 · Other+16 moreCARITAS: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITASURBAN HOPE INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN HOPE INC+1 more: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesPETER PAUL DE…SPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesSPORTABLE RIC…THE NEWDEAL FORUM: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEWDEAL F…RE-ESTABLISH RICHMOND INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesRE-ESTABLISH …+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesDIVERSITY RICHMOND INC: $42,500 · EducationST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER: $15,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF VA: $2,500 · EducationFEED MORE INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOODSHED CAPITAL: $17,500 · Food & NutritionJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $36,000 · EnvironmentRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 · Animals
Other$622,500Housing & Shelter$147,500Human Services$127,500Education$70,000Food & Nutrition$37,500Environment$36,000Animals$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARITAS: $120,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDIVERSITY RICHMOND INC: $42,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $36,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSupportWorks Housing: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN HOPE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $22,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NEWDEAL FORUM: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRE-ESTABLISH RICHMOND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOODSHED CAPITAL: $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGING VIRGINIA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HIVE MENTALITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRICHMONDER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF VA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER HOUSING COALITION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DIVERSITY RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SupportWorks Housing ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds URBAN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWDEAL FORUM ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds RE-ESTABLISH RICHMOND INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHED CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGING VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM FARMSINC ↗
  • Who funds THE HIVE MENTALITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Pauley Family Fou…Herndon FoundationRichmond Memorial Hea…Robins FoundationBon Secours - Richmon…Tesco FoundationVirginia Nonprofit Ho…Dominion Energy Chari…Tr R & Ct Gwathmey Me…Robert G Cabell III a…Altria Companies Empl…
The Community Foundation IncVA41.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Pauley Family Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Robins Foundation · Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc · Tesco Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Tr R & Ct Gwathmey Mem Uw Egj · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Altria Companies Employee Community Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home