· Private foundation
Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPORTABLE - PARALYMPIC SPORT CLUB | $25,000 |
| REESTABLISH RICHMOND | $20,000 |
| FEED MORE | $20,000 |
| NEWDEAL FORUM | $20,000 |
| CARITAS | $20,000 |
| CROSSOVER HEALTHCARE MINISTRY | $20,000 |
| HEALTH BRIGADE | $20,000 |
| CENTRAL VA LEGAL AID SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NC - CHAPEL HILL | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| SUPPORTWORKS HOUSING | $10,000 |
| CHILDSAVERS-MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CTR | $10,000 |
| VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| MASSEY CANCER CENTER - VCU FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCARITAS7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +44%
- CMCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC4× · 2019–2022 · $45k · revenue +97%
- DRDIVERSITY RICHMOND INC5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -5%
- NNNRDC - NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCILone grant, 2023 · $5k
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF VAone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.
Startup virginia is a non-profit, high-growth-business incubator, dedicated to building a long-term, sustainable economy for virginia. we connect our startup community to exceptional mentors and extensive programs in a dynamic workspace.
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
Operate as a virginia referendum committee; operate as a labor-management cooperation committee in accordance with the federal labor-management cooperation act in order to improve communication between representatives of labor and…
Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.
To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.
To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead.
Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…
To champion the connection of needed community resources with schools to help young people successfully learn, stay in school and prepare for life.
VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Re-Establish Richmond Inc and the most unlike its peers is Communities in Schools of Va. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds DIVERSITY RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SupportWorks Housing ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds URBAN HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds SPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
- Who funds RE-ESTABLISH RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEWDEAL FORUM ↗
- Who funds HEALTH BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds FOODSHED CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF VA ↗
- Who funds THE HIVE MENTALITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Pauley Family Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Robins Foundation · Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc · Tesco Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Tr R & Ct Gwathmey Mem Uw Egj · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Altria Companies Employee Community Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn?
Find your warmest path to Im Dena & Chris Moore Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.