Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$845kCrime & Legal$580kInternational$578kArts & Culture$385kCommunity Improvement$240kPhilanthropy$145kEducation$140kHousing & Shelter$135kOther$2.4M
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $246k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Maggie's Place$100,000
New Life Center$100,000
Rockland Pride Center$100,000
Obama Foundation$100,000
Families Raising Hope$100,000
Friends of the Children$100,000
Helping Hands for Single Moms$100,000
Televerde Foundation$90,000
AZ Friends of Foster Children Found$77,000
The Barbell Saves Project$75,000
Center for the Rights of Abused Chi$50,000
Hushabye Nursery$50,000
Amanda Hope Rainbow Angels$50,000
Students Supporting Brain Tumor Res$50,000
Teen Lifeline$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $695k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Maggie's Place: $100k → 11%Valley of the Sun YMCA: $25k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $75k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $75k → 11%NOAH: $50k → 11%NOAH: $25k → 11%New Life Center: $100k → 11%Hushabye Nursery: $50k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $50k → 11%Hushabye Nursery: $50k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $50k → 11%EDUCARE ARIZONA: $45k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 31 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
39

Total granted

$4.0M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

77%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    A NEW LEAF
    3× · 2022–2024 · $350k · revenue +83%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +178%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • VH
    VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -44%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
4
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
5
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
6
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
7
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
10
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc

To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.

Health
11
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
12
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndustry Trade AssociationsArizona Policy & Advocacy O…Performing Arts Organizatio…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Youth Sports ProgramsFood Security & Community S…Senior Affordable HousingDisability & Child Support …Professional Trade Associat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%4%<5yr17%12%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr10%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%3%<5yr17%14%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr10%37%35–55yr10%10%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/63
the rest of the field
17%
2,922/16,990

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
34/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CASS — $160,335 · OtherCASSMOUNTAIN PARK MEDICAL CENTER — $130,000 · OtherMISSION OF MERCY — $110,000 · OtherSave the Family — $105,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC — $100,000 · OtherRockland Pride Center — $100,000 · OtherFriends of the Children — $100,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN PHOENIX INC — $100,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $97,000 · OtherStudents Supporting Brain Tumor Res — $95,000 · OtherLEO FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc — $125,000 · OtherLost Our Home Pet Foundation — $100,000 · Other+36 more — $1,380,300 · Other+36 moreA NEW LEAF — $350,000 · HealthA NEW LEAFPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES — $174,000 · HealthPARENTS OF ADDICTED LO…MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER — $170,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH C…VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUN…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED IN…FAMILIES RAISING HOPE — $100,000 · HealthFAMILIES RAISING HOPEKID IN THE CORNER — $95,000 · HealthKID IN THE CORNERBanner Health Foundation — $75,000 · HealthBanner Health Foundati…AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS — $50,000 · Health+4 more — $102,500 · Health+4 moreHUSHABYE NURSERY — $200,000 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURSE…New Life Center — $100,000 · Human ServicesNew Life Cente…MAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE…CIRCLE THE CITY — $75,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CIT…RYAN HOUSE — $75,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSENOAH INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesNOAH INCValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association — $75,000 · Human ServicesValley of the …ANGELS ON PATROL INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesANGELS ON PATR…EDUCARE ARIZONA — $45,000 · Human ServicesHEALING ARIZONA VETERANS — $40,000 · Human ServicesNew Pathways For Youth — $260,000 · Crime & LegalNew Pathw…Televerde Foundation — $165,000 · Crime & LegalTeleverde…CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA — $125,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD CRI…HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $230,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …ADVANCE COMMUNITY — $213,000 · InternationalADVANCE C…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $75,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN…International Rescue Committee INC — $60,000 · InternationalInternati…BALLET ARIZONA — $130,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $95,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS — $240,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,802,635Health$1,366,500Human Services$845,000Crime & Legal$580,000International$578,000Arts & Culture$385,000Community Improvement$240,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetA NEW LEAF — $350,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth — $260,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS — $240,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $230,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE COMMUNITY — $213,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY — $200,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES — $174,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER — $170,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeleverde Foundation — $165,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA — $130,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA — $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNew Life Center — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $97,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $95,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKID IN THE CORNER — $95,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc — $90,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRYAN HOUSE — $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNOAH INC — $75,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS ON PATROL INC — $60,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC — $55,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NATURAL MEDICINE — $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEDUCARE ARIZONA — $45,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDiana Gregory Outreach Services — $40,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetSONORAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $37,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENTS SUPPORTING BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH — $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHelens Hope Chest — $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAZDA CARES FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE — $22,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLegacy Connection — $20,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Thunderbirds CharitiesBHHS Legacy FoundationJohn F Long Foundatio…The Diane and Bruce H…The Foundation for Co…American Express Foun…William & Ruth Pendle…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…The Board of VisitorsFiesta Events Inc
Arizona Community FoundationAZ59.2× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · BHHS Legacy Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · American Express Foundation · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Board of Visitors · Fiesta Events Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC?

    Find your warmest path to Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines