Skip to content
Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC at a glance

· Private foundation

Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.7MHealth$1.7MYouth Development$822kInternational$578kHousing & Shelter$395kArts & Culture$314kEducation$257kEmployment$205kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $246k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Families Raising Hope$100,000
Maggie's Place$100,000
Friends of the Children$100,000
Obama Foundation$100,000
Rockland Pride Center$100,000
New Life Center$100,000
Helping Hands for Single Moms$100,000
Televerde Foundation$90,000
AZ Friends of Foster Children Found$77,000
The Barbell Saves Project$75,000
Center for the Rights of Abused Chi$50,000
Students Supporting Brain Tumor Res$50,000
Hushabye Nursery$50,000
Teen Lifeline$50,000
DUET Partners in Health and Aging$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $695k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Maggie's Place: $100k → 11%Valley of the Sun YMCA: $25k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $75k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $75k → 11%NOAH: $50k → 11%NOAH: $25k → 11%New Life Center: $100k → 11%Hushabye Nursery: $50k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $50k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $50k → 11%Hushabye Nursery: $50k → 11%EDUCARE ARIZONA: $45k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 31 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
39

Total granted

$4.0M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+6%

Still filing today

77%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    A NEW LEAF
    3× · 2022–2024 · $350k · revenue +83%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +178%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • VH
    VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -44%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN PHOENIX INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
4
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
5
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
6
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
7
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
10
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc

To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.

Health
11
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
12
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
33/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASS: $160,335 · OtherCASSMOUNTAIN PARK MEDICAL CENTER: $130,000 · OtherMISSION OF MERCY: $110,000 · OtherSave the Family: $105,000 · OtherFriends of the Children: $100,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $100,000 · OtherRockland Pride Center: $100,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN PHOENIX INC: $100,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $97,000 · OtherStudents Supporting Brain Tumor Res: $95,000 · OtherLEO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $125,000 · OtherLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $100,000 · Other+36 more: $1,380,300 · Other+36 moreA NEW LEAF: $350,000 · HealthA NEW LEAFPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES: $174,000 · HealthPARENTS OF ADDICTED LO…MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $170,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH C…VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUN…FAMILIES RAISING HOPE: $100,000 · HealthFAMILIES RAISING HOPEBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED IN…KID IN THE CORNER: $95,000 · HealthKID IN THE CORNERBanner Health Foundation: $75,000 · HealthBanner Health Foundati…AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $50,000 · Health+4 more: $102,500 · Health+4 moreHUSHABYE NURSERY: $200,000 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURSE…New Life Center: $100,000 · Human ServicesNew Life Cente…MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE…CIRCLE THE CITY: $75,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CIT…RYAN HOUSE: $75,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSEValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $75,000 · Human ServicesValley of the …NOAH INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesNOAH INCANGELS ON PATROL INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesANGELS ON PATR…EDUCARE ARIZONA: $45,000 · Human ServicesHEALING ARIZONA VETERANS: $40,000 · Human ServicesNew Pathways For Youth: $260,000 · Crime & LegalNew Pathw…Televerde Foundation: $165,000 · Crime & LegalTeleverde…CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $125,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD CRI…HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $230,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …ADVANCE COMMUNITY: $213,000 · InternationalADVANCE C…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $75,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN…International Rescue Committee INC: $60,000 · InternationalInternati…BALLET ARIZONA: $130,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Arts & CulturePHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $95,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $240,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,802,635Health$1,366,500Human Services$845,000Crime & Legal$580,000International$578,000Arts & Culture$385,000Community Improvement$240,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA NEW LEAF: $350,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $260,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $240,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $230,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCE COMMUNITY: $213,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $200,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES: $174,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $170,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeleverde Foundation: $165,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA: $130,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNew Life Center: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILIES RAISING HOPE: $100,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $97,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKID IN THE CORNER: $95,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetPHOENIX SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $95,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOAH INC: $75,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANGELS ON PATROL INC: $60,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC: $55,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NATURAL MEDICINE: $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMILITARY ASSISTANCE MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetEDUCARE ARIZONA: $45,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDiana Gregory Outreach Services: $40,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetSONORAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $37,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENTS SUPPORTING BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH: $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHelens Hope Chest: $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Thunderbirds CharitiesBHHS Legacy FoundationJohn F Long Foundatio…The Diane and Bruce H…The Foundation for Co…American Express Foun…William & Ruth Pendle…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…The Board of VisitorsFiesta Events Inc
Arizona Community FoundationAZ59.2× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · BHHS Legacy Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · American Express Foundation · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Board of Visitors · Fiesta Events Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC?

    Find your warmest path to Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home