Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Hunger Related Events

To address the needs of the hungry and homeless by raising awareness and money through special events and programs.

$525k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$217k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Food & Nutrition$4.9MEducation$125kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$208,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$198k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TB1 FUND$217,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE$208,500
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$99,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $10k → 9%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $20k → 6%ROBERT IRVINE FOUNDATION: $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 37 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +69% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
23

Total granted

$4.5M
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+69%

Still filing today

95%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $434k · revenue +89%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    4× · 2017–2020 · $349k · revenue +119%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $311k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $27k · revenue +35%
  • JC
    JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +169%
  • DD
    DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
12
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Children's Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersPublic University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%66%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%75%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/58
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,507

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/55
Grantees still filing
49/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VEAP Inc — $1,067,500 · OtherVEAP IncGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $434,172 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCThe Houston Food Bank — $210,862 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank+21 more — $473,572 · Other+21 moreSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $349,222 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDFOOD LIFELINE — $191,706 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINEATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $158,271 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INCST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $119,624 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCESECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC — $98,711 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN IN…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $76,641 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $66,777 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $65,702 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance — $60,745 · Food & Nutrition+18 more — $612,141 · Food & Nutrition+18 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE FOUNDATION — $377,155 · Philanthropy+1 more — $12,900 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $310,900 · Education+1 more — $4,000 · EducationTB1 FUND INC — $217,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $20,000 · HealthISLAND HARVEST LTD — $20,000 · Human ServicesROBERT IRVINE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $10,000 · Human ServicesROCK & WRAP IT UP INC — $23,415 · Community ImprovementDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,186,106Food & Nutrition$1,799,540Philanthropy$390,055Education$314,900Health$237,000Human Services$42,000Community Improvement$23,415Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVEAP Inc — $1,067,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $434,172 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE FOUNDATION — $377,155 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $349,222 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $310,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $210,862 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $191,706 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $158,271 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $119,624 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC — $98,711 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $76,641 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $66,777 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $65,702 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance — $60,745 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $53,413 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK — $51,407 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $51,324 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $49,470 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $45,630 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $45,340 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $45,212 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $43,263 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $40,966 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $40,743 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC — $38,718 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $37,117 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $36,768 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDMORE WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $35,003 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION — $34,050 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $33,660 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $33,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $31,942 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $29,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $26,732 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $25,513 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCK & WRAP IT UP INC — $23,415 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $18,212 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $12,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT IRVINE FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FALDO TRUST FOR TOMORROW'S CHAMPIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes Foundati…Charities Aid Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…Renaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…
Land O'Lakes FoundationMN12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hunger Related Events funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines