Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Health in Partnership

Health in Partnership transforms the field of public health to center health equity and builds collective power with social justice movements.

$497k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$311kCommunity Improvement$276kHousing & Shelter$241kHealth$180kHuman Services$118kEmployment$100kYouth Development$81kArts & Culture$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $412,330 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $496,622 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $84,292 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $405k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDRENS PARTNERSHIP$32,500
NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER$30,500
ONE LOVE GLOBAL INC$30,500
COMMUNITY ORG & FAMILY ISSUES$30,500
ACTION COUNCIL OF MONTEREY CT$30,500
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$30,000
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSO$30,000
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION IN$30,000
PREVENTION INSTITUTE$30,000
CHANGELAB SOLUTIONS$30,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$30,000
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$30,000
TIDES CENTER$20,000
STRATEGIC ACT FOR A JUST ECON$10,200
RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%St Josephs House: $33k → 6%LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION: $10k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%Chainbreaker Collective: $33k → 12%ONE LOVE GLOBAL INC: $31k → 16%United for a New Economy: $10k → 7%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY CO: $15k → 10%LA COLABORATIVA INC: $31k → 16%Tides Center: $15k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $10k → 14%Chainbreaker Collective: $17k → 12%United for a New Economy CO: $10k → 7%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $31k → 14%Family Values at Work: $15k → 17%THE CHILDRENS PARTNERSHIP: $33k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
MO
NM
KS
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$813k · 13 repeat orgs$756k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$813k
$374k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+52%

Still filing today

92%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $382k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +211%
  • 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $95k · revenue +177%
  • CC
    CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St Josephs House Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +32%
  • SU
    Step Up Louisiana Organizing Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue +127%
  • CA
    CLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue -106%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
3
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
4
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
5
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
6
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
7
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
8
Mid-City Community Advocacy Network

Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.

Community Improvement
9
Mujeres Unidas y Activas

MUAis an organization of Latina and Indigenous immigrant women with the mission of growing our personal and community power to achieve social and economic justice. Personal transformation and civic-political participation go hand in hand.

Human Services
10
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
11
Inquilinos Unidos

Dedicated to empowering low-income tenants through community organizing, education and advocacy to fight for safe, decent, and affordable housing in los angeles.

Unclassified
12
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Councils Inc and the most unlike its peers is Missouri Faith Voices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $50,000 · Human ServicesCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVETIDES CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $35,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOM…St Josephs House Inc — $33,333 · Human ServicesSt Josephs House IncTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $32,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERS…NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER — $30,500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING …ONE LOVE GLOBAL — $30,500 · Human ServicesONE LOVE GLOBALLA COLABORATIVA INC — $30,500 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INCMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT — $20,000 · Human ServicesMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUN…FAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM — $15,000 · Human Services+2 more — $20,000 · Human Services+2 more9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $95,000 · Other9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKI…Tenants Union of Washington — $50,000 · OtherTenants Union of WashingtonCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATION — $30,500 · OtherCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATIONHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $30,000 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYFood Not Bombs Free Skool — $30,000 · OtherFood Not Bombs Free SkoolSANTA BARBARA COUNTY FIRE DEPT — $20,000 · OtherSt Joseph's House of Hospitality — $16,667 · OtherTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC — $50,000 · OtherTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INCAction Council of Monterey County Inc — $30,500 · OtherAction Council of Monterey County …ChangeLab Solutions — $30,000 · OtherChangeLab SolutionsKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION — $30,000 · OtherKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION+5 more — $47,630 · Other+5 moreRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $240,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIA…Step Up Louisiana Organizing Fund — $30,500 · Civil RightsStep Up Louisiana Organ…NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $30,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER OR…+3 more — $28,000 · Civil Rights+3 moreINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterINQUILINXS…HOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING JU…COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF TENANTS — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY …THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES — $30,500 · Community ImprovementCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy — $20,000 · Community ImprovementLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO — $11,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute — $30,000 · HealthSAJE — $10,200 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC — $10,000 · HealthCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE — $50,000 · Arts & CulturePrevention Institute — $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$332,333Other$490,297Civil Rights$329,000Housing & Shelter$150,000Community Improvement$111,500Health$110,200Arts & Culture$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $240,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $50,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE — $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE — $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTenants Union of Washington — $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF TENANTS — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSt Josephs House Inc — $33,333 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $32,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER — $30,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetStep Up Louisiana Organizing Fund — $30,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATION — $30,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetONE LOVE GLOBAL — $30,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $30,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAction Council of Monterey County Inc — $30,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES — $30,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC — $30,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChangeLab Solutions — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrevention Institute — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSt Joseph's House of Hospitality — $16,667 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMissouri Faith Voices Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAJE — $10,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO HEALTH ACCESS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFresno Barrios Unidos — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice — $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPennsylvania Public Health Association — $7,630 over 1y, 29% of budgetUnited for Respect Education Fund — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationThe California Endowm…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Robert Wood Johns…Right to the City All…The James Irvine Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Wellne…New Venture FundPolicylinkRockefeller Philanthr…East Bay Community Fo…
Tides FoundationCA28.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The California Endowment · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Right to the City Alliance · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · New Venture Fund · Policylink · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · East Bay Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Health in Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Community Alliance of Tenants — 100% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines