Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ladd Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Environment$373kEducation$215kHuman Services$100kHealth$80kArts & Culture$75kCrime & Legal$56kPublic Benefit$55kFood & Nutrition$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $220k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST IN FAMILY JACKSON HOLE$45,000
PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE$35,000
SLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS$25,000
TETON COUNTY ACCESS TO JUSTICE JACKSON HOLE$25,000
TETON FREE CLINIC$20,000
WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK (WYCEN)$20,000
ONE22$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE BRIDGER TETON$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
OLD WILSON SCHOOLHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRANSGENDER GENDER VARIANT INTERSEX JUSTICE PROJECT: $25k → 10%WYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECT (WIAP): $25k → 5%ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 5%ONE22: $20k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
ID
MT
IL
MA
WY
CT
CA
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$446k · 7 repeat orgs$699k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
26

Total granted

$446k
$529k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +120%
  • PO
    PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +93%
  • HF
    Hole Food Rescue
    2× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • JH
    JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • TY
    TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -54%
  • IR
    INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jackson Hole Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county

—
2
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment
3
Jackson Hole Wildlife Foundation

Jackson hole wildlife foundation advances wildlife conservation driven by science, collaboration, and a community of volunteers.

Animals
4
The Jackson Hole Technology Partnership

To fuel local, regional and global tech ecosystems to shape a better future.

Science & Tech
5
Rendezvous Lands Conservancy

To improve the quality of life in rural intermountain west communities by protecting, owning, and creating locally significant keystone conservation properties as public access parks.

Environment
6
Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance

The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.

Environment
7
Grand Teton National Park Foundation

Grand Teton National Park Foundation (the Foundation) is a private, nonprofit organization whose mission is to partner with Grand Teton National Park to steward, protect, and enhance all that is special in the park. Budget limitations,…

Philanthropy
8
Land Trust of the Treasure Valley

To create oppurtunites for conservation of natural, scenic, historic, recreational and agricultural values of southwestern idaho's open spaces through collabarative efforts for current and future generations. the land trust indentifies…

Environment
9
Wallowa Land Trust

Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.

Environment
10
Grand Teton Association

The mission of the association is to inspire "deeper connection, better understanding, and enduring support for our public lands."

Arts & Culture
11
Wyofile

Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…

Arts & Culture
12
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson Hole Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Child and Family ServicesLgbtq+ Community CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Fallen First Responder Supp…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsRotary Club FoundationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…Community Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%7%<5yr13%19%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr13%19%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%9%<5yr13%12%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr13%14%20–35yr15%29%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
543/5,285

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC — $115,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE I…JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST — $50,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUSTTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONSLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INCCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INCFRIENDS OF THE BRIDGER-TETON — $20,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE BRIDGER-TETONWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EnvironmentWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATIONTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDAstoria Park Conservancy — $15,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM — $60,000 · OtherJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEU…INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES — $25,000 · OtherINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICESSLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC — $25,000 · OtherSLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INCTRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $25,000 · OtherTRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDTETON COUNTY ACCESS TO JUSTICE JACKSON HOLE — $25,000 · OtherTETON COUNTY ACCESS TO JUSTICE JACKSON HO…ASTORIA PARK CONSERVANCY — $25,000 · OtherASTORIA PARK CONSERVANCYTETON RAPTOR CENTER CHARITABLE GRANT — $25,000 · OtherTETON RAPTOR CENTER CHARITABLE GRANTASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN SUPPORT FOUNDATIONAFGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $20,000 · OtherWYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK (WYCEN) — $20,000 · OtherTETON FREE CLINIC — $20,000 · OtherTETON RAPTOR CENTER — $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PATHWAYSTeton County Search & Rescue Foundation — $15,000 · OtherORGANIZE TENNESSEE — $20,000 · OtherBecoming Jackson Whole — $15,000 · OtherThe Theater Project — $15,000 · Other+8 more — $53,500 · Other+8 moreASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $125,000 · EducationASIAN UNIVERSITY F…FIRST IN FAMILY JACKSON HOLE — $45,000 · EducationFIRST IN FAMILY JA…Jackson Hole Community School — $25,000 · EducationJackson Hole Commu…One22 Inc — $45,000 · Human ServicesOne22 IncWYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECT — $25,000 · Human ServicesWYOMING I…Miss Major and Alexander L Lees TGIJP — $25,000 · Human ServicesMiss Majo…TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $35,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyHole Food Rescue — $26,000 · Food & Nutrition
Environment$340,000Other$433,500Education$195,000Human Services$95,000Health$60,000Philanthropy$40,000Food & Nutrition$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE INC — $115,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM — $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOne22 Inc — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHole Food Rescue — $26,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWYOMING IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY PROJECT — $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMiss Major and Alexander L Lees TGIJP — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJackson Hole Community School — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetORGANIZE TENNESSEE — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeton County Search & Rescue Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBecoming Jackson Whole — $15,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetAstoria Park Conservancy — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJACKSON HOLE FIREEMS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBATH HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTETON COUNTY SHERIFF'S AUXILIARY — $5,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Hughes Charitable Fou…Hughes Charitable Fou…Morse Family Foundati…The Brooks FoundationJaquith Family Founda…Giving BrandsPerkins Charitable Fo…The San Francisco Fou…The Miami Foundation …First Interstate Banc…Darrick and Julia Wal…
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY34.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · Morse Family Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Jaquith Family Foundation · Giving Brands · Perkins Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Darrick and Julia Walker Open Hands Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ladd Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home