Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hudson Hospital Foundation Inc

To support, act for the benefit of, and carry out the charitable purpose of hudson hospital, inc.

$214k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.4MHuman Services$72kCrime & Legal$40kYouth Development$25kEducation$25kEnvironment$25kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $149,016 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $213,911 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,895 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSON HOSPITAL INC$67,516
HUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,000
KINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST$15,000
ST CROIX VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT TEAM$15,000
FAMILY MEANS$10,000
MINNESOTA JUNIOR CYCLING$10,000
GROW TO SHARE$10,000
OPERATION HELP$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%FAMILY MEANS: $10k → 6%HUDSON YMCA: $21k → 5%BUILDING HEALTHIER AMERICA: $15k → 5%CASA OF ST CROIX COUNTY: $10k → 5%CASA OF ST CROIX COUNTY: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 4 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
-3%

Still filing today

100%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HUDSON HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +37%
  • YO
    YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +33%
  • CO
    CASA OF ST CROIX COUNTY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +590% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • WH
    WESTFIELDS HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +72%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue -3%
  • HC
    HUDSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakeview Memorial Hospital Association Inc

To meet the healthcare needs of individuals, families & communities of the st. croix valley.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Hudson Hospital Foundation Inc

To support, act for the benefit of, and carry out the charitable purpose of hudson hospital, inc. by supporting community health education, providing home care assistance, and contributing to other health related charitable endeavors.

4
Park Nicollet Group Return

To improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

5
Aitkin Community Hospital Dba Riverwood Healthcare Center

To improve health by providing high quality, compassionate and personalized care.

Health
6
Freeport Regional Health Care Foundation

Our mission is to improve the health of our communities, working together with those we serve.

Health
7
Madison County Community Hospital

Madison health's vision is to provide exceptional healthcare in a respectful, compassionate, and healing environment.

Health
8
Hutchinson Health

Advancing health with the community of hutchinson, minnesota and the surrounding area. providing a caring, personal experience for each patient and lead in promoting health and wellness in the community.

Health
9
Regions Hospital

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality health care which meets the needs of all people. our vision is to be the patient-centered hospital of choice of our community.

Health
10
Park Nicollet Health Services

Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

Health
11
St Croix Valley Healthcare Fdn

To promote quality health care for individuals, families and communities in the st. croix valley by conducting charitable, educational, scientific and fundraising activities in support of our communities' health care organizations.

12
St Cloud Area Family Ymca

St. Cloud Area Family YMCA's mission is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that promote healthy lifestyles, strong families and positive youth development to build healthy spirit, mind and body for all, regardless…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Respectacle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUDSON HOSPITAL INC — $2,280,390 · HealthHUDSON HOSPITAL INC+3 more — $47,980 · HealthYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC — $30,000 · OtherHUDSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $15,000 · OtherHudson Area Backpack and Food Program Inc — $15,000 · OtherST CROIX VALLEY SART INC — $15,000 · OtherHUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT — $15,000 · OtherHUDSON HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC — $15,000 · OtherOPERATION HELP INC — $11,500 · OtherGROW TO SHARE INC — $10,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherMINNESOTA JUNIOR CYCLING INC — $10,000 · OtherST CROIX THERAPY INC — $8,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $20,500 · Human ServicesCASA OF ST CROIX COUNTY INC — $15,100 · Human ServicesBUILDING HEALTHIER AMERICA — $15,000 · Human ServicesFAMILYMEANS — $10,000 · Human ServicesKINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyHEALING PLAY INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionRespectacle Inc — $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$2,328,370Other$154,500Human Services$60,600Environment$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUDSON HOSPITAL INC — $2,280,390 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetWESTFIELDS HOSPITAL INC — $34,980 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $20,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF ST CROIX COUNTY INC — $15,100 over 2y, 29% of budgetHudson Area Backpack and Food Program Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetKINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY SART INC — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetOPERATION HELP INC — $11,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING PLAY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY FOODBANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILYMEANS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRespectacle Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetST CROIX THERAPY INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Croix Valley FoundationWI26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Croix Valley Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Weekes Family Foundation · United Way St Croix and Red Cedar Valleys Inc · Westconsin Credit Union · Andersen Corporate Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hudson Hospital Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph