Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Holly Lane Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.8MReligion$1.0MHuman Services$177kEducation$134kRecreation & Sports$38kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $2,478,040 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,548,040 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $288k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Annandale$1,000,000
Shepherd Center$1,000,000
Jewish Family & Career Services$135,000
Grady Health Foundation$50,000
Adaptive Learning Center$35,000
FODAC$30,000
Atlanta Speech School$30,000
Special Needs School of Gwinnett$25,000
Hi-Hope Service Center$25,000
DDD Foundation$25,000
Spectrum$25,000
Side by Side Brain Injury Clubhouse$23,040
Center For The Visually Impaired$20,000
Southwest Christian Care$20,000
ADMH$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 16 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

56%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’22’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
  • SB
    Side by Side Brain Injury Clubhouse
    4× · 2018–2024 · $108k · revenue +32%
  • TG
    THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -77% · 40% of their budget
  • TK
    THE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +240%
  • TF
    THE FRAZER CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
2
Alexander Leigh Center for Autism

To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…

Education
3
Sargent Rehabilitation Center Inc

It is the mission of Sargent Rehabilitation Center to rehabilitate children and young adults with disabilities for maximum community access to education daily living and employment.

Education
4
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
5
Sisu of Georgia Inc

To serve children with disabilities and their typical peers through state-of-the art educational, therapeutic, nursing and family support services in an integrated environment.

—
6
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
7
The Achievable Foundation

Achievable health's mission is to provide high-quality healthcare to our community, with a specialty in treating individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

Human Services
8
Capability Health & Human Services

Capability health and human services is dedicated to providing transformational and life enhancing services to children and adults with disabilities facing a physical, mental, or social limitation.

Human Services
9
Developmental Services Center of Champaign County Inc

Developmental services center (dsc) supports people with disabilities in living a rich and meaningful life.

Human Services
10
Spectrum for Living Development Inc

To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.

Human Services
11
The Summit Center Inc

The summit center, inc. is a private, not-for-profit organization approved by new york state to provide educational, therapeutic, and support services to children and young adults with autism, speech delays and disorders, and other…

Education
12
Kelberman Center Inc

The kelberman center is a regional center for excellence for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and related learning challenges. we are dedicated to excellence in service through: prompt evaluation and diagnosis; individualized…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elaine Clark Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Kyle Pease Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr9%70%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,280

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Annandale — $1,000,000 · OtherAnnandaleFODAC — $85,000 · OtherFODACChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta — $76,625 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $65,000 · OtherSpecial Needs School of Gwinnett — $50,000 · Other+9 more — $216,348 · Other+9 moreSHEPHERD CENTER INC — $1,035,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INCSide by Side Brain Injury Clubhouse — $108,040 · HealthSide by Side Brain Injury ClubhouseDDD FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · Health+3 more — $85,000 · Health+3 moreJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesHI-HOPE SERVICE CENTER INC — $80,700 · Human ServicesConnectability Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · PhilanthropySHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC — $33,000 · PhilanthropyAtlanta Speech School Inc — $46,100 · EducationTHE ELAINE CLARK CENTER INC — $12,000 · EducationTHRESHOLD COMMUNITY PROGRAM INC — $11,500 · Education+1 more — $1,740 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,492,973Health$1,293,040Human Services$235,700Philanthropy$158,000Education$71,340Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC — $1,035,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC — $135,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSide by Side Brain Injury Clubhouse — $108,040 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHI-HOPE SERVICE CENTER INC — $80,700 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDDD FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAtlanta Speech School Inc — $46,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HOSPICE & HOPE HOUSE INC — $40,619 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC — $40,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE ADAPTIVE LEARNING CENTER FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN INC — $35,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC — $33,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE FRAZER CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetConnectability Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE ELAINE CLARK CENTER INC — $12,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHRESHOLD COMMUNITY PROGRAM INC — $11,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ellis School of Atlanta Inc — $1,740 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Imlay Foundation …The Community Foundat…The Scott Hudgens Fam…United Way of Greater…RothkopfGreenberg Fam…Community Foundation …Atl Fdn-W Peters MainTuw Thomas H PittsTr Uw Charles I BrananThe Resurgens Charita…The Enterline Foundat…Frances Wood Wilson F…
The Imlay Foundation IncGA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · RothkopfGreenberg Family Foundation Trust · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Tuw Thomas H Pitts · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Resurgens Charitable Foundation Inc · The Enterline Foundation · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home