How much did THE ENTERLINE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of THE ENTERLINE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

special vehiclevehicle purchaseapplause

2019

special assistiveassistive technology

2020

due covidcovid pandemicmade necessarynecessary dueppe madestaffdigital

2021

group

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $28k
$10k–50k20 grants · $250k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$19,778
HI-HOPE SERVICE CENTER INC$15,618
Cedar Lake Foundation Inc$15,000
L'Arche Chicago$15,000
United Cerebral Palsy Seguin$15,000
Quality Life Concepts Inc$15,000
The Nika Project$15,000
Encore Developmental Services$15,000
Lighthouse Vocational Services$15,000
Center for Enriched Living$10,000
Asocoacion Mayaguezana de Personaco$10,000
Council on Quality Learning$10,000
ZABS Place$10,000
Oak Leyden Development Services$10,000
Developmental Disabilities Ministri$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$806k · 21 repeat orgs$618k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$806k

$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%

+20%

Still filing today

71%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEmploymentHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NA
NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE
7× · 2017–2024 · $161k · revenue +18%
Case Western Reserve University
3× · 2019–2021 · $100k · revenue +26%
HA
HOLY ANGELS INC
7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +24%

Funded once

MA
MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES
one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -4%
MA
Milestones Autism Organization
one grant, 2022 · $15k
PC
Primose Center Inc
one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Center for Disabilities

Empowering people with disabilities to function as independently as possible and to be active, contributing members of society.

Human Services

Developmental Services Continuum Inc

The mission of Developmental Services Continuum, Inc. is to provide support and services for children and adults with developmental disabilities.

—

Autism Services Inc

Operates group homes for autistic adults and children. provides a myriad of services for autistic individuals.

—

Cape Abilities Inc

Training & job placement and resident services to disabled adults.

Human Services

Abilities Inc

The mission of Abilities Inc is to increase the employment of people with disabilities by providing assessments, skills training, job placement and job retention.

—

Direct Center for Independence Inc

DIRECT Center for Independence, Inc. advocates voice, choice and independence for people with disabilities. Directs vision is universal access and opportunity for all people with disabilities.

Human Services

Temco Inc

Provide meaningful employment opportunities to persons with developmental disabilities in our service area

—

Ccri Inc

CCRI supports children, adults, and families touched by a disability. We inspire people to reach their full potential and we do not let a disability define who a person is. Our mission is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of…

—

Developing Potential Inc

Operation of a Facility for training the severely handicapped to increase thier earning capabilities and to increase opportunities for health and wellness.

Employment

Vocational Solutions

Developmental and rehabilitation services for disabled individuals

—

Innovative Industries Inc

Provide employment for develpmentally disabled individuals.

Employment

Employu Inc

Employu is a disability employment service creating an inclusive workforce for people with disabilities through education, empowerment and advocacy.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hi-Hope Service Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Seec. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/50

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,515

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

48 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

48/48

Grantees still filing

36/48

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$658,503Human Services$380,042Education$160,000Health$127,900Employment$85,000Arts & Culture$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jackson Emc Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jackson Emc Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ENTERLINE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Go Long for Luke.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 471596074 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Go Long for Luke, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Enterline Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Enterline Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ENTERLINE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

48 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Enterline Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE ENTERLINE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

48 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Enterline Foundation?

More from the funding graph