· Private foundation
Tuw Thomas H Pitts
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k58 grants · $59k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME | $58,000 |
| THE EXTENSION INC | $2,000 |
| EAGLE RANCH INC | $1,000 |
| LAAMISTAD INC | $1,000 |
| NANA GRANTS INC | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER | $1,000 |
| R L C CORP DBA LUTHERAN TOWERS | $1,000 |
| SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INC | $1,000 |
| HELPING HANDS OF PAULDING COUNTY INC | $1,000 |
| SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC | $1,000 |
| VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GEORGI | $1,000 |
| LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC | $1,000 |
| WOMEN MOVING ON INC | $1,000 |
| STATUS HOME | $1,000 |
| THE FRAZER CENTER INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
81 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMust Ministries Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +46%
- FOFOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +203%
- WMWOMEN MOVING ON INC WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER TO END DV6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- TCTHE CALLANWOLDE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2021 · $2k
- AAAsian American Resource Foundation Incone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society.
To empower women and their children experiencing homelessness to achieve economic independence and long-term stability.
To assist the homeless and the needy.
To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24
The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…
Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…
HomeAids mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.
To provide shelter, food, and supportive services to homeless individuals and families of DeKalb County, and to advocate for the rights of homeless individuals and families.
The organization provides assistance to and a supportive community for people whose mental illnesses prevent them from participating in community life, employment, and relationships.
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…
Support and sponsor those experiencing hopelessness and homelessness, through residential rehabilitation, recovery and treatment programs, Christian-based spiritual mentopring and counseling, life skills training and resources infused with…
Through crisis intervention, comprehensive support services and community collaboration, gateway domestic violence center helps create an environment for safe, healthy, self-sufficient growth, and violence prevention.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Top Dogg K9 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MOVING ON INC WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER TO END DV ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
- Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds youthSpark Inc ↗
- Who funds FCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Clifton Sanctuary Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds COVENANT COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds SER FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds THE FRAZER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds House of Cherith Inc ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds STATUS HOME INC F/K/A JERUSALEM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds 247 GATEWAY LLC ↗
- Who funds Nicholas House Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds METRO ATLANTA RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAINING & COUNSELING CENTER AT SAINT LUKES INC ↗
- Who funds Inspiritus Inc ↗
- Who funds ZABAN PARADIES CENTER FOR HOMELESS COUPLES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DDD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds LITERACY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds ETHNE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Central Outreach and Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST MINISTRY WITH CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Nana Grants Inc ↗
- Who funds REFUGE COFFEE CO ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tuw Thomas H Pitts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.