Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hollingsworth Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$7.7MYouth Development$642kPhilanthropy$258kCommunity Improvement$124kAnimals$29kReligion$15kHealth$11kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ANDERSON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$4,000
OASIS OF LOVE MINISTRIES INC$1,000
YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NATIONAL PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 15%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $1k → 12%ASPIRE FOUNDATION: $6.3M → 13%POSITIVE OUTCOMES WORLDWIDE: $10k → 6%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 → 15%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $1k → 12%ASPIRE FOUNDATION: $113k → 13%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $500 → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $113k → 13%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $500 → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $110k → 13%GREAT SMOKY MTN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $2k → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $106k → 13%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $500 → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $101k → 13%GREAT SMOKY MTN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $250 → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $85k → 13%YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER: $500 → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $77k → 13%LEGACY PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $76k → 13%EAST TN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $10k → 12%PEARL FOUNDATION GREATER CLINTON: $20k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $80k → 12%JR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN: $10k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $45k → 12%ANDERSON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $4k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $40k → 12%HOLLINGSWORTH ENTREPRENEURIAL FOUND: $4k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $35k → 12%ANDERSON CO DISTRICT ATTY: $1k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $30k → 12%ANDERSON CO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 13%UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLE: $28k → 12%CITY OF CLINTON: $500 → 13%KNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC: $25k → 12%CLINTON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $350 → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TN VALLEY: $35k → 12%MUSEUM OF APPALACHIA: $750 → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TN VALLEY: $10k → 12%FRIENDS OF ANDERSON CO DRUG COURT: $2k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TN VALLEY: $200 → 12%FRIENDS OF ANDERSON CO DRUG COURT: $2k → 13%FRIENDS OF ANDERSON CO DRUG COURT: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 9 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$8.6M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+66%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASPIRE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $6.4M · revenue +2%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +56%
  • YA
    YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • KZ
    KNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +27%
  • PF
    PEARL FOUNDATION GREATER CLINTON
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • ET
    EAST TN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Aquarium

The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.

Animals
2
Nashville Zoo Inc

In fulfillment of our mission to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership, our goal is to build a first class zoo for middle tennessee and to develop a facility…

Animals
3
The Muse Knoxville

To inspire and empower all children through transformative learning experiences. our vision is to make our community the best place for all to learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
4
Knoxville Museum of Art

The purpose of the knoxville museum of art is to support and promote public interest, awareness, knowledge and education in the visual arts in east tennessee . to this end, the corporation shall, among other things, develop permanent…

Arts & Culture
5
Knoxville Science Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Tennessee State Parks Conservancy

To support education, health and access programs that preserve, protect, and enhance Tennessee's natural areas and parks system.

Environment
7
Knoxville Botanical Gardens and Arboretum

Knoxville botanical gardens and arboretum provides and maintains gardens for the benefit and enjoyment of the general public.

Environment
8
Tennessee River Museum

To present and promote the historical aspect of the local river from pre-history until the present day

Arts & Culture
9
Oak Creek Zoological Conservatory
Animals
10
Tennessee Geographic Alliance

Education

Education
11
Tennessee Wildlife Federation Foundation Inc

To administer funds for the use and benefit of the tennessee wildlife federation.

12
Tennessee Titans Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tennessee 4-H Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspire Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASPIRE FOUNDATION — $6,413,129 · Recreation & SportsASPIRE FOUNDATION+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCLINTON HS FOOTBALL BOOSTERS — $1,195,207 · OtherCLINTON HS FOOTBALL BOOSTERSJR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TN — $676,806 · OtherJR ACHIEVEMENT OF EAST TNUNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLEINC — $257,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVI…+12 more — $58,250 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $45,200 · Youth DevelopmentKNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC — $25,000 · AnimalsYOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN — $4,000 · AnimalsOASIS OF LOVE MINISTRIES INC — $14,500 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthANDERSON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $4,000 · Community ImprovementTENNESSEE STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF APPALACHIA — $750 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$6,414,129Other$2,187,763Youth Development$45,200Animals$29,000Health$14,750Community Improvement$4,000Arts & Culture$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLEINC — $257,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $45,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOASIS OF LOVE MINISTRIES INC — $14,500 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetYOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTENNESSEE 4-H FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTENNESSEE STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLEGACY PARKS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF APPALACHIA — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER KNOXVILLEINC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
  • Who funds KNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC
  • Who funds OASIS OF LOVE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN
  • Who funds ANDERSON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
  • Who funds TENNESSEE 4-H FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TENNESSEE STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEGACY PARKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF APPALACHIA
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Haslam Family Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Haslam Family Foundation Inc · The Clayton Family Foundation · The Boyd Foundation · Food City Charitable Foundation · Stowers Machinery Foundation Inc · Battelle Memorial Institute · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hollingsworth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hollingsworth Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hollingsworth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph