· Private foundation
His Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION | $30,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $20,000 |
| FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION | $20,000 |
| WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY | $16,539 |
| ENCOUNTER CHURCH | $15,000 |
| HEALING THE CULTURE | $12,000 |
| LEGACY INSTITUTE | $12,000 |
| OPERATION NIGHT WATCH | $10,000 |
| ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE | $7,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE | $5,000 |
| DISCOVERY INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION(PORTLAND) | $5,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION(SEATTLE) | $5,000 |
| USO | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +28%
- HTHEALING THE CULTURE8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +51%
- FWFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- FAFRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL OF PUGET SOUNDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +138%
- SWSOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -18%
- CWCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…
The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…
See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…
To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,
Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.
Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs
The seminary's mission is to learn and teach how to be: attentive to god; responsible biblical and theological interpreters; faithful individuals, congregations, and communities acting with god to transform the world.
The family research council's primary exempt purpose is to reaffirm and promote nationally, and particularly in washington, dc, the traditional family unit and the judeo-christian value system upon which it is built. frc's activities in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agros International and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds HEALING THE CULTURE ↗
- Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds AGROS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION NIGHTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds The Legacy Institute ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Urban Impact ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Urban Alternative ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds STRONGER FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds PEACETREES VIETNAM ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds Family Policy Institute of Washington ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Seattle Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Encourage & Impact Foundation · Apex Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization His Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.