· Public charity
High Tech High Heels North Texas
The organizations exempt purpose is to close the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and math (stem).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $172k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PARTNER | $72,000 |
| AFTER SCHOOL ALL-STARS N TX | $50,000 |
| DESIGN CONNECT CREATE | $50,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR INSPIRATION | $40,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF METRO DALLAS | $25,000 |
| YOUNG WOMENS PREPARATORY NET | $15,000 |
| PREFLIGHT AVIATION CAMP | $13,000 |
| GIRLSTART | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $423k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANational Alliance for Partnerships In Equity Education Foundation Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $288k · revenue +9%
- AAAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS5× · 2020–2024 · $238k · revenue +29%
- FFFoundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc4× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +58%
Funded once
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +44%- SDSCI-TECH DISCOVERY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +136%
- ARART REACHING OUTone grant, 2020 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…
Self-eSTEM ignites pride, purpose and possibility among girls and women, by providing STEM training that strengthens digital, technical and leadership skills, sustaining their STEM identities.
The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.
The national girls collaborative project believes science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) skills can be acquired by anyone and fostered in everyone. our initiatives build confidence and create a community of "lifelong stem…
To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.
Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.
To promote education and to create awareness, excitement, and opportunities among girls and young women to launch successful stem-related careers.
ChickTech is dedicated to advancing diversity in science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM)by increasing retention and building the pipeline of underrepresented technologists with a focus on women, girls, and non-binary people of all…
To expose girls and young women to the exciting and challenging opportunities availalbe in the many fields of stem.
STEM Gems is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to building a stronger, more inclusive STEM pipeline by empowering girls and young women of all backgrounds to explore, pursue, and excel in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM).…
Our mission is to expose a diverse population of young girls to a high quality STEM academy that inspires confidence in their pursuit of ling throughout the year
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Metropolitan Dallas and the most unlike its peers is The Gems Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DESIGN CONNECT CREATE ↗
- Who funds National Alliance for Partnerships In Equity Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SOLAR PREP ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S PREPARATORY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds The GEMS Camp ↗
- Who funds PREFLIGHT AVIATION CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
- Who funds SCI-TECH DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TECO THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization High Tech High Heels North Texas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.