Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hesed Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$632kHealth$255kInternational$222kEducation$177kCommunity Improvement$33kPublic Benefit$21kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESERVOIR CHURCH$160,000
FOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP$25,000
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$25,000
REBUILD AFRICA$23,000
PRESIDENTS AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$20,000
LEADERSHIP TRANSFORMATIONS INC$15,000
LIFE WORK DIRECTION$15,000
SOCIETY OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST$10,000
FRIENDS OF ASHA USA$10,000
PAX CENTER$10,000
VILLAGE ENTERPRISE$10,000
MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
MOSAIC CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION$8,000
FOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MA
IN
NJ
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+84%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    REBUILD AFRICA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $155k · revenue +10%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +119%
  • LD
    LIFEWORK DIRECTION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • LT
    LEARDSHIP TRANSFORMATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SH
    Special Hope Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +84%
  • MC
    MOSAIC CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATIONS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
12
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESERVOIR CHURCH: $469,000 · OtherRESERVOIR CHURCHLIFEWORK DIRECTION: $51,000 · OtherLIFEWORK DIRECTIONHARVARD TA CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $45,000 · OtherHARVARD TA CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTHGEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $35,000 · OtherWORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $32,000 · Other+7 more: $87,500 · Other+7 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $116,600 · EducationPresident and Fell…The George Washington University: $45,000 · EducationThe George Washing…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIV…FOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP: $25,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR SEL…REBUILD AFRICA INC: $154,500 · InternationalREBUILD AFRICA…VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $23,000 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERP…FRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC: $110,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF A…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN …CANINE THERAPY CORPS INC: $15,000 · HealthCANINE THERA…Leadership Transformation Inc: $42,500 · ReligionThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $12,500 · ReligionMOSAIC CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION: $8,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $29,575 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF BARRINGTON'S WHITE HOUSE: $3,000 · Community ImprovementSpecial Hope Network: $4,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS GLOBAL INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$719,500Education$216,600International$177,500Health$145,000Religion$65,000Community Improvement$32,575Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREBUILD AFRICA INC: $154,500 over 7y, 21% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $116,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC: $110,000 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetLIFEWORK DIRECTION: $51,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Transformation Inc: $42,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $29,575 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP: $25,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE THERAPY CORPS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $12,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMOSAIC CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION: $8,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSpecial Hope Network: $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BARRINGTON'S WHITE HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS GLOBAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REBUILD AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ASHA USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORK DIRECTION ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Transformation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SELF LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE THERAPY CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION ↗
  • Who funds Special Hope Network ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BARRINGTON'S WHITE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Imago Dei FundMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Imago Dei Fund · Impactassetsinc · Boston Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hesed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hesed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hesed’s filings →

More from the funding graph