Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herrick Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$163kEducation$69kArts & Culture$58kHealth$39kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$6kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$974k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
TELLURIDE FOUNDATION$10,000
TELLURIDE NORDIC ASSOCIATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,875
ST ANNE'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC$1,875
TELLURIDE HIGH SCHOOL$89
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%ANGEL BASKETS INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 10 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$233k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $46k · revenue +26%
  • HS
    HOLDERNESS SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +38%
  • TM
    Telluride Mountain Club
    3× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +782%

Funded once

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -19%
  • TS
    TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TO
    THE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Telluride Mountain School Inc

The School delivers a program of challenging academics that promotes critical thinking, aesthetic expression and ethical behavior, while encompassing a commitment to community service, global citizenship and engagement with the natural…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
4
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
5
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
8
Trillium Academy

The mission of trillium academy is to break away from conventional schooling and celebrate the incredible capabilities of twice-exceptional (2e) students, providing them with the learning environment they need to discover and develop their…

Education
9
The Telluride Academy Inc

Inspire children and teens through experiential education that promotes physical activity, creative learning, environmental stewardship, responsibility to others, and positive life choices.

Education
10
Trellis Foundation

We believe every texas student deserves the opportunity to earn a postsecondary credential or degree that helps them achieve the future they envision for themselves and their families. we invest in the programs, practices, and policies…

Human Services
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Mills College

Mills college is an independent liberal arts college for women and gender nonbinary students, with graduate programs for all genders. the college educates students to think critically and communicate responsibly and effectively, to accept…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Telluride Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nova-Mba Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Recreation & SportsTELLURIDE FOUNDATIONTelluride Mountain Club: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTelluride Mountain ClubCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY+1 more: $4,500 · Recreation & SportsIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $5,000 · Other+10 more: $14,876 · Other+10 moreNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $45,700 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUN…CAMPO GARZON INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCAMPO GARZON I…SHERIDAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $4,400 · Arts & CultureSHERIDAN ARTS …FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationFRANKLIN & MAR…HOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationHOLDERNESS SCH…THE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE OLIVERIAN …THE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE TELLU…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $11,000 · HealthMARCH OF …MED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 · HealthMED ACCES…NETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,300 · Public Safety & DisasterAngel Baskets Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Recreation & Sports$163,000Other$109,276Arts & Culture$55,100Education$55,000Health$38,500Public Safety & Disaster$10,300Human Services$6,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $45,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTelluride Mountain Club: $20,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY: $13,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Baskets Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE OLIVERIAN SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPO GARZON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTelluride Nordic AssociationInc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSHERIDAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $4,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNOVA-MBA Association: $3,317 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetMED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSt Anne's Episcopal School Inc: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dalton Family FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dalton Family Foundation · Telluride Foundation · The Lisa and Victor Nemeroff Foundation · The Thomas Phillips and Jane Moore Johnson Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herrick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herrick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herrick Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Herrick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herrick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph