Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Hepatitis B Foundation

The mission of the HEPATITIS B FOUNDATION is to find a cure for hepatitis b and improve the quality of life for those affected worldwide through research, education and patient advocacy.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$300kHuman Services$103kCommunity Improvement$35kCivil Rights$33kPhilanthropy$29kEducation$14kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $54,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $157,715 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $103,715 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$9,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF GREATER HOUSTON$9,000
ASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$9,000
DREXEL HOPE$9,000
KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METRO NY$9,000
SF HEP B FREE-BAY AREA$9,000
HEPATITIS B INITIATIVE OF WASHINGTON DC$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE APA MEDICAL STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METRO NY: $10k → 13%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PASIFIKA ORGANIZATIONS: $8k → 14%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $9k → 17%COLORADO CHILDREN'S IMMUNIZATION COALITION: $10k → 9%MERCY HOUSING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 19%KOREAN AMERICAN OUTREACH GROUP: $8k → 6%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METRO NY: $9k → 13%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $8k → 17%COLORADO CHILDREN'S IMMUNIZATION COALITION: $9k → 9%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METRO NY: $6k → 13%ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION: $6k → 17%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METRO NY INC: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AR
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$371k · 15 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +68% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$371k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+68%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +1%
  • AO
    Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations
    5× · 2018–2023 · $38k · revenue +223%
  • KC
    KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • PC
    PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +76%
  • AP
    ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN MEDICAL STUDENTS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Asian Public Health Association
Health
2
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
3
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
4
Asian Pacific Center for Human Development

To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.

Health
5
African American Mens Health Clinic

Bmhc is a no wrong-door safety net program for men of color. our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any validated…

Health
6
Asian-American National Committee Inc

Various national educational programs and services.

Arts & Culture
7
The Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc

To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.

Health
8
Healthy Asians & Pacific Islanders Medical Center
Health
9
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
10
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
11
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
12
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Health Coalition of the Greater Houston Area and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Public University Foundatio…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersAsian American Advocacy & H…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
30/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations — $38,000 · HealthAssociation of Asian Pacific Community Health Organiza…MIDWEST ASIAN HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $27,500 · HealthMIDWEST ASIAN HEALTH ASSOCIATIONHEPATITIS B INITIATIVE OF WASHINGTON DC — $27,500 · HealthHEPATITIS B INITIATIVE OF WASHINGTON DCVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION — $27,500 · HealthVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN PACIFIC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $23,000 · HealthAMERICAN PACIFIC HEALTH FOUNDATIONASIAN WOMEN FOR HEALTH INC — $20,000 · HealthASIAN WOMEN FOR HEALTH INCASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $16,000 · HealthASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON…VIETNAM VIRAL HEPATITIS ALLIANCE (VVHA) — $15,000 · HealthVIETNAM VIRAL HEPATITIS ALLIANCE (VVHA)INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $10,500 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $10,000 · HealthHAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER — $10,000 · Health+4 more — $27,500 · Health+4 moreKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC — $33,500 · Human ServicesKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVI…ASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesASIAN SERVICES IN ACTI…IMMUNIZE COLORADO — $19,000 · Human ServicesIMMUNIZE COLORADOASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN MEDICAL STUDENTS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN…KOREAN AMERICAN OUTREACH GROUP — $7,500 · Human ServicesKOREAN AMERICAN OUTREA…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PASIFIKA ORGANIZATIONS — $7,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION O…+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $45,500 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN COMMU…Center for Pan Asian Community Services — $16,500 · OtherCenter for Pan Asian…URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $10,000 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALIT…CITY OF PHILADELPHIA — $8,000 · OtherCITY OF PHILADELPHIAOhio Asian American Health Coalition — $7,000 · OtherOhio Asian American …+2 more — $5,500 · Other+2 moreCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $29,000 · PhilanthropyPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Community ImprovementDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $9,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationAFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA — $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$252,500Human Services$103,000Other$92,500Philanthropy$29,000Community Improvement$25,000Education$14,000Arts & Culture$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES — $45,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAssociation of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations — $38,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC — $33,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ASIAN HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $27,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHEPATITIS B INITIATIVE OF WASHINGTON DC — $27,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN PACIFIC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 4y, 61% of budgetASIAN SERVICES IN ACTION INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN WOMEN FOR HEALTH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetIMMUNIZE COLORADO — $19,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCenter for Pan Asian Community Services — $16,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN HEALTH COALITION OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VIRAL HEPATITIS ALLIANCE (VVHA) — $15,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN MEDICAL STUDENTS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN HEALTH COALITION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN HEALTH COALITION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PASIFIKA ORGANIZATIONS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOhio Asian American Health Coalition — $7,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDA — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian & Pacific Islan…GofundmeorgAssociation of Asian …National Foundation f…National Coalition fo…AARPDirect ReliefNational Council on A…Wallace H Coulter Fou…Prevent Cancer Founda…AARP FoundationReach Out and Read Inc
Asian & Pacific Islander American Health ForumCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum · Gofundmeorg · Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development · AARP · Direct Relief · National Council on Aging Inc · Wallace H Coulter Foundation · Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn · AARP Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hepatitis B Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Asian Women for Health Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $114k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines