· Private foundation
Henry Safford Peacock Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND | $21,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $10,000 |
| ABRAHAM LINCOLN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUND | $5,000 |
| BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WETLANDS INITIATIVE | $5,000 |
| FOUNTAIN HILLS DARK SKY ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED | $5,000 |
| LINCOLN AREA YMCA | $5,000 |
| BELGRADE LAKES ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| VERDECARES INC | $5,000 |
| SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER | $5,000 |
| THE TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RIO VERDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,430 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $2,000 |
| WYCLIFF BIBLE TRANSLATORS | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
116 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HEIGHTS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +67%
- LELINCOLN ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT INC2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +3%
- LALINCOLN AREA YMCA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +512%
Funded once
- OSOAKCREST SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +4%
- WFWOODLAWN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
- KAKinsella Arts Incone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue 0% · 51% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HEIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN AREA YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds VerdeCares Inc ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds OAKCREST SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BELGRADE LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds 7 LAKES ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MASTER'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CODESPA AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LAND OF LINCOLN GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds RIO VERDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF LOGAN COUNTY INC D/B/A OASIS SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kinsella Arts Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Woods Foundation · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Ensign-Bickford Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Illinois Prairie Community Foundation Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henry Safford Peacock Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.