· Private foundation
Henagan Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $80,000 |
| THE SQUARED NETWORK | $60,000 |
| CHASTAIN PARK CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP | $15,000 |
| NORTHSIDE CHURCH UNITED METHODIST CONGREGATION | $15,000 |
| WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL | $11,000 |
| SANDY SPRINGS ARTS FOUNDATION INC | $8,200 |
| CHATHAM HOUSE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC (ATLANTA HISTORY CENTER) | $5,000 |
| SAINT LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $3,000 |
| AMI KIDS INC | $2,500 |
| THE CARTER CENTER | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPChastain Park Conservancy Inc4× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +30%
- TATHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC7× · 2017–2024 · $146k · revenue +226%
- EUEmory University5× · 2019–2023 · $101k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- VNVISITING NURSE HEALTH SYSTEMHOSPICE ATLANTAone grant, 2018 · $22k
- SLSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTERone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +11%
- VNVISITING NURSE HOSPICE ATLANTA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Tank Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Chastain Park Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ATLANTA ↗
- Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SQUARED NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sandy Springs Arts Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TANK LTD ↗
- Who funds Morgan County Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Christian City Inc ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHATHAM HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUFORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Mills Foundation Inc · The Kelin Foundation · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henagan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
- Family Resource Network Inc — 47% of income from government
- Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Henagan Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Henagan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.