Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helms Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$335k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$250kHousing & Shelter$129kReligion$118kFood & Nutrition$45kInternational$27kCrime & Legal$25kCommunity Improvement$16kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$8,266
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER SIGMA CHI HOUSE$150,000
ILLUMINATE COMMUNITY CHURCH$100,000
Individual grant recipient$35,852
MIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT$25,000
HOUSE OF REFUGE$8,266
PROVERBS 31 MINISTRIES$5,285
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,010
FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION$2,500
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$2,200
CORTNEY'S PLACE$1,029
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%FRESH START WOMENS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
IN
CA
CO
NE
MO
AZ
TN
NC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$424k · 10 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$424k
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+78%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $210k · revenue +51%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +16%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF REFUGE INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZON
    one grant, 2023 · $120k
  • SC
    Sigma Chi Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +4%
  • BA
    BALLET ARIZONA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
3
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
8
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
11
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
12
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZON: $120,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONILLUMINATE COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $106,000 · OtherILLUMINATE COMMUNITY CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $44,801 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,885 · Other+15 more: $26,008 · Other+15 moreSIGMA CHI FRATERNITY GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER: $210,000 · EducationSIGMA CHI FRATERNITY GAMMA DELTA CHAPTERSigma Chi Foundation: $40,000 · EducationSigma Chi FoundationMIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCompassion International Incorporated: $15,611 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $3,969 · InternationalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,696 · ReligionPROVERBS 31 MINISTRY INC: $5,285 · ReligionHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $9,296 · Housing & ShelterFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesCORTNEYS PLACE: $1,029 · Human Services
Other$312,694Education$250,000Crime & Legal$25,000International$19,580Religion$12,981Housing & Shelter$9,296Human Services$8,529

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSigma Chi Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $9,296 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,696 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROVERBS 31 MINISTRY INC: $5,285 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $3,969 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN WAYNE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORTNEYS PLACE: $1,029 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOYS FOR KIDS INC: $101 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY GAMMA DELTA CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVERBS 31 MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN WAYNE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORTNEYS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOYS FOR KIDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helms Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helms Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Toys for Kids Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helms Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph