· Public charity
Hedge Funds Care Inc
The principal mission of hedge funds care is to support efforts to prevent and treat child abuse.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k32 grants · $852k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR EVALUATION AND COUNSELING INC | $50,000 |
| FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN (NYSPCC) | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| MID-FAIRFIELD CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC (ALSO REFERRED TO AS MID-FAIRFIELD | $50,000 |
| LOVE146 | $50,000 |
| MERCYFIRST | $50,000 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW JERSEY | $48,000 |
| BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $40,200 |
| POWER OF TWO A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK | $40,000 |
| CASA-NYC | $40,000 |
| NEW YORK COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILDREN (COAC) | $40,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $40,000 |
| CITIZENS' COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
69 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGRAHAM WINDHAM7× · 2017–2023 · $335k · revenue +27%
- LILOVE146 INC8× · 2017–2024 · $330k · revenue +110%
- JBJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +5%
Funded once
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +48%- CACourt Appointed Special Advocates Incone grant, 2017 · $60k
- USUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…
To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Dependency advocacy center (dac) provides zealous legal representation to indigent clients in the juvenile dependency system to promote timely reunification and preservation of families in a safe, healthy environment. dac believes that…
Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…
The children's advocacy center of greater west texas, inc.'s mission is to champion the prevention of child abuse and to serve as an ally of abused children with a dedication to securing a safe and nurturing home for each child.
The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.
The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.
The center coordinates the investigation and treatment of the most serious cases of child abuse in the bluegrass region. all services are provided in a nurturing, friendly and safe environment at no cost to a child's family.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is East Bay Community Recovery Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
- Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds DEIRDRE O'BRIEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN LTD ↗
- Who funds The Korean American Family Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Family Paths Inc ↗
- Who funds TEEN PARENT CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
- Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC ↗
- Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CARE CONNECTION OFFICE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
- Who funds SafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BAYVIEW FUTURES FKA CENTER FOR YOUTH WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds ADELPHI UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Imagination Theater Inc ↗
- Who funds FRONT RANGE CENTER FOR ASSAULT PREVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · National Children's Alliance Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · East Bay Community Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Jesse Parker Williams Foundation Inc · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hedge Funds Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc — 95% of income from government
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Mid-Fairfield Child Guidance Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Human Services Council Inc — 27% of income from government
- Boston Casa Inc — 20% of income from government
- Community Access Unlimited Inc — 15% of income from government
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.