Skip to content
Health Leads Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Health Leads Inc

We partner with communities and health systems to address systemic causes of inequity and disease.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$1.0MHousing & Shelter$894kHealth$507kHuman Services$45kCommunity Improvement$31kFood & Nutrition$27kEnvironment$20kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $176,062, the rows itemized in this filing. The $211,372 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,310 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COPE FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$38,400
EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATION CENTER$32,000
INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH & WELL-BEING$20,412
PEOPLE WHO CARE CHILDREN ASSOCIATION$20,400
INDEPENDENT ARTS AND MEDIA$19,200
VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$19,200
ALIADOS HEALTH$16,250
RAINBOW COMMUNITY CENTER OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$10,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $8k → 7%211 SAN DIEGO: $45k → 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATION CENTER: $32k → 14%COPE FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $38k → 9%INFO LINE SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $11k → 11%VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $19k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
TN
NC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 5 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$565k
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+9%

Still filing today

60%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    Tenants Together
    3× · 2022–2024 · $348k · revenue -28%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH & WELL-BEING
    3× · 2023–2025 · $78k
  • IL
    INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $56k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
  • EI
    Eden I & R Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $169k · revenue -1%
  • MW
    Matthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $121k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
2
United Way of Merced County

We mobilize the caring power of our community to advance health stability and opportunity for all.

Philanthropy
3
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
4
Gardner Family Health Network Inc

Gardner Health Services (GHS) is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive medical and mental healthcare, including prevention and education, early intervention, treatment and advocacy services which are affordable, respectful,…

Health
5
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
6
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
7
Pacific Center for Human Growth

Provides culturally responsive therapy, peer to peer support groups, community outreach services, and facilitated workshops in Alameda County with the aim to enhance the mental health and overall well-being of the LGBTQIA+ and QTBIPOC…

—
8
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
9
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
10
California Health Collaborative

Improving health and wellness of individuals with limited access to health-care resources and who most often confront barriers related to culture, language, immigration status, income, gender, geography, and/or education.

Health
11
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
12
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center; the most unlike its peers is Gregory B Davis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC: $1,000,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC+1 more: $27,250 · InternationalEden I & R Inc: $168,725 · OtherEden I & R IncMatthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Inc: $121,294 · OtherMatthew Walker Comprehensiv…INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH & WELL-BEING: $78,162 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEME…HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $69,175 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION …CONVINCE USA: $66,083 · OtherCONVINCE USAFULL COURT PRESS COMMUNICATION: $55,361 · OtherFULL COURT PRESS COMMUNICAT…+7 more: $117,226 · Other+7 moreTenants Together: $348,404 · Food & NutritionTenants Togeth…UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $283,073 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …HEARTLAND HEALTH CENTER: $120,000 · HealthHEARTLAND …BROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 · HealthBROWNSVILL…VITAL CXNS INC: $26,960 · HealthVITAL CXNS…ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $25,901 · HealthROGUE COMM…People Who Care Children's Association: $20,400 · HealthPeople Who…ALIADOS HEALTH: $16,250 · HealthALIADOS HE…INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $56,000 · Human ServicesCOPE Family Support Center Inc: $38,400 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $32,000 · Human ServicesVillage Community Resource Center: $19,200 · Human ServicesALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $7,500 · Human ServicesGREGORY B DAVIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsRainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County: $10,200 · Recreation & Sports
International$1,027,250Other$676,026Food & Nutrition$348,404Philanthropy$283,073Health$259,511Human Services$153,100Recreation & Sports$30,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTenants Together: $348,404 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $283,073 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEden I & R Inc: $168,725 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMatthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Inc: $121,294 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEARTLAND HEALTH CENTER: $120,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $69,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $56,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPE Family Support Center Inc: $38,400 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $32,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $27,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVITAL CXNS INC: $26,960 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $25,901 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeople Who Care Children's Association: $20,400 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMarked By COVID: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGREGORY B DAVIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetAfrican Chamber of Commerce Colorado USA: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRESHAIR COLLECTIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetVillage Community Resource Center: $19,200 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $16,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County: $10,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Health Leads Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Health Leads Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Rogue Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health Leads’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home