· Public charity
Health Leads Inc
Health leads is fueled by a vision of health, dignity and well-being for every person in every community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TENANTS TOGETHER | $85,408 |
| HO'A | $20,526 |
| FRESHAIR COLLECTIVE INC | $20,000 |
| GREGORY B DAVIS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MARKED BY COVID | $20,000 |
| AFRICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CO | $20,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH & WELL-BEING | $19,250 |
| INFO LINE SAN DIEGO COUNTY | $11,000 |
| PANORAMA GLOBAL | $7,650 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTenants Together3× · 2022–2024 · $348k · revenue -28%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH & WELL-BEING2× · 2023–2024 · $58k
- ILINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY2× · 2022–2024 · $56k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TGTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INCone grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
- EIEden I & R Incone grant, 2022 · $169k · revenue -1%
- MWMatthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Incone grant, 2022 · $121k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
We mobilize the caring power of our community to advance health stability and opportunity for all.
HBI-DCs mission is to mobilize communities to prevent liver diseases caused by viral hepatitis among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, African immigrants, and other high-risk groups. Through collaborative partnerships, our…
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
Healthconnect one (hc one) is the national leader in advancing equitable, community-based, peer-to-peer support for pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding and early parenting. hc one realizes its mission by promoting health equity. we work to…
To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.
Our mission is to unify global public health efforts focused on airborne pathogens and clean air quality. We are creating scalable platforms that provide clear, verified public health information about pathogens, clean air, safe locations,…
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
Improving health and wellness of individuals with limited access to health-care resources and who most often confront barriers related to culture, language, immigration status, income, gender, geography, and/or education.
Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vital Cxns Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gregory B Davis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC ↗
- Who funds Tenants Together ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds Eden I & R Inc ↗
- Who funds Matthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds VITAL CXNS INC ↗
- Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds African Chamber of Commerce Colorado USA ↗
- Who funds Marked By COVID ↗
- Who funds GREGORY B DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRESHAIR COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds ALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Health Leads Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Rogue Community Health — 13% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.