Skip to content
Health in Partnership at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Health in Partnership

Health in Partnership transforms the field of public health to center health equity and builds collective power with social justice movements.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$311kCommunity Improvement$276kHousing & Shelter$241kHealth$180kHuman Services$118kEmployment$100kYouth Development$81kArts & Culture$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $55,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $96,907 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,807 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES CENTER$20,000
PARA LOS NINOS$10,000
LATINO CTR PREVENTION & ACT$10,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS$10,000
ANTI POLICE-TERROR PROJECT$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $352k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%St Josephs House: $33k → 6%LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION: $10k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%Chainbreaker Collective: $33k → 12%ONE LOVE GLOBAL INC: $31k → 16%United for a New Economy: $10k → 7%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY CO: $15k → 10%LA COLABORATIVA INC: $31k → 16%LATINO CTR PREVENTION & ACT: $10k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%Chainbreaker Collective: $17k → 12%United for a New Economy CO: $10k → 7%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $31k → 14%Tides Center: $15k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $10k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $10k → 14%Family Values at Work: $15k → 17%THE CHILDRENS PARTNERSHIP: $33k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
MO
NM
KS
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$873k · 16 repeat orgs$731k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
32

Total granted

$873k
$726k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

94%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +211%
  • 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $95k · revenue +177%
  • TU
    Tenants Union of Washington
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St Josephs House Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +32%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES
    one grant, 2024 · $31k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
3
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
4
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
5
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
6
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
7
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
8
Mujeres Unidas y Activas

MUAis an organization of Latina and Indigenous immigrant women with the mission of growing our personal and community power to achieve social and economic justice. Personal transformation and civic-political participation go hand in hand.

Human Services
9
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
10
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
11
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
12
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Councils Inc; the most unlike its peers is Missouri Faith Voices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
28/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIDES CENTER: $55,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVEUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $35,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMYSt Josephs House Inc: $33,333 · Human ServicesSt Josephs House IncTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $32,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHI…NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $30,500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CE…LA COLABORATIVA INC: $30,500 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INCONE LOVE GLOBAL: $30,500 · Human ServicesONE LOVE GLOBALLATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $20,000 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESSMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $20,000 · Human ServicesMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNIT…PARA LOS NINOS: $20,000 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOSFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $15,000 · Human ServicesRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $240,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLI…NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $30,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER O…Step Up Louisiana Organizing Fund: $30,500 · Civil RightsStep Up Louisiana Orga…+4 more: $33,100 · Civil Rights+4 more9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $95,000 · Other9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORK…Tenants Union of Washington: $50,000 · OtherTenants Union of WashingtonCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATION: $30,500 · OtherCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATIONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYFood Not Bombs Free Skool: $30,000 · OtherFood Not Bombs Free SkoolHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $30,000 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCSANTA BARBARA COUNTY FIRE DEPT: $20,000 · OtherSt Joseph's House of Hospitality: $16,667 · OtherTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INCAction Council of Monterey County Inc: $30,500 · OtherAction Council of Monterey County…ChangeLab Solutions: $30,000 · OtherChangeLab SolutionsKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION: $30,000 · OtherKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION+5 more: $47,630 · Other+5 moreINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterINQUILINXS…HOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING JU…COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF TENANTS: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute: $30,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC: $20,000 · HealthSAJE: $10,200 · HealthTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $30,500 · Community ImprovementCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy: $20,000 · Community ImprovementLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO: $11,000 · Community ImprovementCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePrevention Institute: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$372,333Civil Rights$334,100Other$490,297Housing & Shelter$150,000Health$120,200Community Improvement$111,500Arts & Culture$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $240,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTenants Union of Washington: $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE: $50,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE: $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHOUSING JUSTICE LEAGUE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF TENANTS: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSt Josephs House Inc: $33,333 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $32,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $30,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $30,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC: $30,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetONE LOVE GLOBAL: $30,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCLEANAIRNOW ASSOCIATION: $30,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetAction Council of Monterey County Inc: $30,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK: $30,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStep Up Louisiana Organizing Fund: $30,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChangeLab Solutions: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrevention Institute: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Joseph's House of Hospitality: $16,667 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMissouri Faith Voices Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAJE: $10,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFresno Barrios Unidos: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPennsylvania Public Health Association: $7,630 over 1y, 29% of budgetUnited for Respect Education Fund: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationThe California Endowm…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Robert Wood Johns…Right to the City All…The James Irvine Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Wellne…New Venture FundPolicylinkRockefeller Philanthr…East Bay Community Fo…
Tides FoundationCA28.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The California Endowment · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Right to the City Alliance · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · New Venture Fund · Policylink · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · East Bay Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Health in Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Health in Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Community Alliance of Tenants: 100% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Health in Partnership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home