· Private foundation
Healey Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k95 grants · $233k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $533k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $818k
- $250k+1 grant · $427k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL | $427,411 |
| THE DREXEL FUND | $117,250 |
| THE JEREMY AND MEGAN HEALEY FAMILY FUND | $100,000 |
| THE JOHN AND MEGAN HAGERTY FAMILY FUND | $100,000 |
| CRISTO REY NETWORK | $95,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA | $75,400 |
| TRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $62,500 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PATERSON | $55,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER | $53,250 |
| GREENLIGHT FUND INC | $50,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - WALL STREET ALLIANCE | $41,500 |
| IRISH ARTS CENTER | $30,000 |
| CATHOLIC EXTENSION SOCIETY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
153 repeat relationships — 99 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $444k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY5× · 2020–2024 · $375k · revenue +36%- CRCRISTO REY NETWORK4× · 2021–2024 · $270k · revenue +75%
DUKE UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2023 · $250k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- WPWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +75%
- PAPortsmouth Abbey Schoolone grant, 2020 · $92k
- HUHarvard University - M-RCBGone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
186 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 186 of the 382 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DREXEL FUND ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN STATE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEMONT COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
- Who funds MV YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK ↗
- Who funds SOVEREIGN MILITARY HOSPITALLER ORDER OF SAINT JOHN OF JERUSALEM OF RHODES ↗
- Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONNIE DWYER BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Paula and William J Marino Family Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Wicks Chapin Inc · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community in Crisis Inc — 56% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc — 34% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Plaid House Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Orleans Conservation Trust — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark — 1% of income from government
- Georgian Court University — 1% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Healey Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Healey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.