Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hawley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$609kFood & Nutrition$256kAnimals$148kReligion$122kScience & Tech$83kEducation$80kHealth$75kArts & Culture$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Arbor Day Foundation$10,000
Conservancy of Southwest Florida$10,000
NutritionFactsorg$10,000
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy$10,000
Audubon of Florida$10,000
Natural Resources Defense Council$9,100
Greenhouse Scholars$5,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$5,000
Augsburg Suzuki Talent Education$5,000
The Raptor Center University of Minnesota$5,000
Department of Entomology of University of Minnesota$5,000
Earth Island Institute$4,000
Minnesota Land Trust$4,000
Amazon Conservation Team$3,000
Ocean Conservation Research$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PROJECT I SEE YOU: $3k → 7%SAME Cafe: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
NM
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Hawley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hawley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 32 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against +87% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
18

Total granted

$1.5M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
+87%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationScience & TechHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +561%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +41%
  • Earth Island Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • AC
    Augsberg College Suzuki Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • UO
    Univ of MN Department of Entomology - Grad School
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AO
    Audubon of Florida - Corkswcrew Swamp
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
8
Rare

Rare inspires change so people and nature thrive.

Environment
9
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
11
Blue World Foundation Inc

To stabilize the population of marine species in danger, especially sharks and rays in the caribbean of guatemala; through science and community strengthening which will provide the creation of alternative livelihoods, which eventually…

Environment
12
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy; the most unlike its peers is Amazon Conservation Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $156,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAAUGSBURG COLLEGE SUZUKI FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherAUGSBURG COLLEGE SUZUKI FOUNDATIONAUDUBON OF FLORIDA: $94,500 · OtherAUDUBON OF FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $68,000 · OtherDEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAThe Raptor Center University of Minnesota: $58,000 · OtherThe Raptor Center University of MinnesotaNutrition Facts: $50,000 · OtherNutrition FactsPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $35,000 · OtherNational Resource Defense Council: $30,000 · Other+24 more: $202,336 · Other+24 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $121,100 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE C…Earth Island Institute Inc: $87,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute IncMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $65,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA LAND TRUSTTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION I…OCEAN CONSERVATION RESEARCH: $28,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVATION RESEARCHMINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY: $24,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRO…NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Environment+2 more: $9,000 · EnvironmentFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK …Nutritionfactsorg Inc: $58,000 · Food & NutritionNutritionf…FOOD FOR HOPE: $12,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR H…AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $58,000 · Science & TechInstitute for Responsible Technology: $57,500 · Science & TechGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $83,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCMDANCE: $48,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT I SEE YOU: $3,000 · Human ServicesSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$793,836Environment$389,100Food & Nutrition$145,000Science & Tech$115,500Education$84,000Arts & Culture$48,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $156,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $121,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $87,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $83,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $65,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNutritionfactsorg Inc: $58,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $58,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetInstitute for Responsible Technology: $57,500 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCMDANCE: $48,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVATION RESEARCH: $28,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY: $24,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR HOPE: $12,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANGEASEED FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE GROWHAUS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetGROWE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Nutritionfactsorg Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Responsible Technology ↗
  • Who funds CMDANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVATION RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds PANGEASEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GROWHAUS ↗
  • Who funds THE CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hawley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hawley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hawley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hawley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hawley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph