· Private foundation
Havercroft Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Colorado Academy | $25,000 |
| AFTERHOURS DENVER UNITED METHODIST | $10,000 |
| ST ANNES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| THE CULTURE HOUSE | $3,000 |
| THE GATHERING PLACE | $2,800 |
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $2,500 |
| Panthera | $2,500 |
| WINGS OF HOPE FOR PANCREATIC CANCER | $2,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $2,236 |
| OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES | $2,000 |
| DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUND | $2,000 |
| WASHINGTON PARK UNITED METHODIST CH | $2,000 |
| POLARIS PROJECT | $2,000 |
| DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING AR | $2,000 |
| KGSA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOLORADO ACADEMY7× · 2019–2025 · $108k · revenue +40%
- SASt Anne's Episcopal School Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $76k · revenue +17%
- UMUNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- TRTHE RICKS CENTER FOR GIFTED CHILDREone grant, 2018 · $15k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF DENVERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +33%
- ADAFTERHOURS DENVER INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide a challenging environment where children can reach their full potential by enhancing their musical talents, forging diverse meaningful friendships, and sharing their joy of music with others.
To create extraordinary experiences that champion the wonder and joy of childhood.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Kgsa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Episcopal School Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Wings of Hope for Pancreatic Cancer Research ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR YOUTH GANG ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds THE CULTURE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Colorado Soccer Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FEEDING DENVERS HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO FUSION SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Second Chance Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Havercroft Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.