Skip to content
Haskett Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Haskett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$72kHuman Services$61kCrime & Legal$41kEducation$35kReligion$12kYouth Development$9kHousing & Shelter$8kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$823k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVOW HOSPICE$12,000
GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS$12,000
THE SHELTER GUILD$8,000
LACES OF LOVE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $12k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $12k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $9k → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER: $8k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $5k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $5k → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER: $2k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER: $500 → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $12k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $12k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $10k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $6k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $5k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $1k → 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $1k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 8 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +111% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$229k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+40%

Still filing today

63%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AVOW Hospice Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +46%
  • GP
    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +111%
  • PI
    PATH2FREEDOM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +306%

Funded once

  • FB
    FRANKFORT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +352%
  • NT
    Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hollys Hope of North Port
Education
2
Hope for Paws

Hope for paws rescues dogs and all other animals who are suffering on the streets and in shelters. our goal is to educate people on the importance of companion animals in our society, to reduce euthanasia rates at shelters, (continued on…

Animals
3
Camillus House Inc

Rooted in the compassionate hospitality of st. john of god, we improve the quality of life of those who are vulnerable and homeless in south florida through the provision of a continuum of housing and supportive services.

—
4
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
5
Pathways Hospice

Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.

Human Services
6
Interhope Inc

To assist in the rescue and care of abandoned and orphaned children in the developing world and to advocate for them by creating awareness of their plight within Christian churches.

Religion
7
Family Nurturing Center of Florida Inc

To provide a nurturing environment for families impacted by divorce, custody battles, and domestic violence, by keeping children safe during these challenging times and helping parents foster positive relationships with their children.

Crime & Legal
8
Dogs for Life Inc

The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…

Animals
9
Nami Palm Beach County Inc

Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
10
Paws Crossed Animal Rescue Inc

To aid in animal rescue and provide medical care, nourishment, and a safe haven for abandoned, abused, and disabled animals. to engage in education, advocacy and collaboration in its mission "to rescue one by one until there are none".

Animals
11
Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…

—
12
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Foster Children Forever Inc Dba Fostering Success Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVOW Hospice Inc: $67,670 · Human ServicesAVOW Hospice IncGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $45,470 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs IncFRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER INC DBA FOSTERING SUCCESS INC: $11,700 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER INC DBA FOSTERING S…+1 more: $4,200 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…THE SHELTER GUILD: $8,000 · OtherTHE SHELTER GUILDFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $7,700 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHU…TIPTON COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · OtherTIPTON COUNTY FOUNDATI…FRANKFORT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $6,000 · OtherFRANKFORT BOYS & GIRLS…BOYS AND GIRL CLUB: $2,500 · Other+2 more: $1,763 · OtherPATH2FREEDOM INC: $40,500 · Crime & LegalPATH2FREEDOM INCLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $34,900 · EducationLACES OF LOVE …East-West Ministries International: $3,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $3,500 · HealthNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $1,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVES: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$129,040Other$52,463Crime & Legal$40,500Education$34,900Religion$5,000Health$4,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVOW Hospice Inc: $67,670 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc: $45,470 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPATH2FREEDOM INC: $40,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $34,900 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOREVER INC DBA FOSTERING SUCCESS INC: $11,700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTIPTON COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $4,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Clark Family Foundati…The League Club IncThe Richard M Schulze…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Collier Community Foundation IncFL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Clark Family Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haskett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haskett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Haskett Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Haskett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haskett Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home