Skip to content
Hasan Charity Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hasan Charity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$137kReligion$72kCrime & Legal$49kHuman Services$41kHousing & Shelter$37kHealth$29kEducation$26kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Doctors Without Borders USA$10,000
USA for UNHCR$10,000
University Muslim Medical Associati$10,000
Salam Charity USA$8,000
Helping Hand for Relief and Develop$5,000
Hidaya Foundation$5,000
ICNA RELIEF USA Programs Inc$3,500
California Cricket Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Salam Charity USA: $18k → 8%Helping Hand for Relief and Develop: $5k → 8%Salam Charity USA: $8k → 8%Islah LA: $5k → 14%Helping Hand for Relief and Develop: $3k → 8%Islah LA: $3k → 14%Islah LA: $3k → 14%University Muslim Medical Associati: $10k → 14%University Muslim Medical Associati: $5k → 14%Rahima International Foundation: $5k → 8%University Muslim Medical Associati: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$257k · 17 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
33

Total granted

$257k
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+14%

Still filing today

76%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +13%
  • IK
    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +63%
  • ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • LO
    LAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGN
    one grant, 2019 · $37k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $29k
  • N
    NUSTIANgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +297%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
4
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
6
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
7
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
8
Us Help Inc

We are a non-profit charity organization that humbly aims to provide to those in need around the world. With gratitude & love, we try to provide food, water, clothing, shelter, peace & education to needy persons, families and communities.

Human Services
9
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Allah Wale Trust Inc

To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan

Food & Nutrition
11
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
12
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Zakat Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is California Cricket Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
19/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGN: $37,277 · OtherLAW OFFICE OF SUE SAIGNDARUL FALAH ISLAMIC CENTER: $30,000 · OtherDARUL FALAH ISLAMIC CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $20,499 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCHUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other+24 more: $69,760 · Other+24 moreUnited States Association for UNHCR: $32,000 · InternationalUnited States Ass…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,850 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…International Rescue Committee INC: $5,150 · InternationalInternational Res…American Relief Fund Inc: $5,000 · InternationalAmerican Relief F…ISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $2,950 · InternationalFRIENDS OF HUMANITY NFP: $2,500 · International+1 more: $650 · InternationalSALAM CHARITY USA: $26,330 · Human ServicesSALAM CHARITY USAUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY MUSLIM…ISLAH LA: $11,000 · Human ServicesISLAH LAHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $7,600 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR …RAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,112 · Human ServicesRAHIMA INTERNATIO…NUSTIAN: $10,204 · EducationSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT: $10,000 · EducationAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $7,998 · EducationDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC: $4,510 · EducationISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC: $21,945 · ReligionISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · ReligionISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY: $1,500 · ReligionICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $19,001 · Public Safety & DisasterHIDAYA FOUNDATION: $16,750 · Philanthropy
Other$204,136International$69,100Human Services$67,542Education$32,712Religion$28,445Public Safety & Disaster$19,001Philanthropy$16,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALAM CHARITY USA: $26,330 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF IRVINE INC: $21,945 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $20,499 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $19,001 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION: $16,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAH LA: $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNUSTIAN: $10,204 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $7,998 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $7,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $6,779 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA CRICKET FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAHIMA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,112 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Relief Fund Inc: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKarwan E ILM Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC: $4,510 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMPLY PURE BASEBALL: $4,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA: $3,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $2,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUMANITY NFP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRAND ALLIANCE FOR PAKISTAN: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHELPING HEARTS CARING SOULS: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HUMANITY NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Commu…Fatima Welfare Founda…Mohammady FoundationM Zamin & Reshma Faru…Darul Sadaqa786Edwards Lifesciences …Sempra FoundationBright Funds Foundati…Ayesha Omar Khadbai F…Good Planet FoundationAnalog Devices Founda…Raghib Family Foundat…
American Muslim Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Fatima Welfare Foundation · Mohammady Foundation · M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Ayesha Omar Khadbai Foundation · Good Planet Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Raghib Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hasan Charity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hasan Charity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hasan Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home